Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:03 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,524,110 times
Reputation: 25816

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
If a company is projected to earn $2 billion for its shareholders and only earn $1.5 billion then YES they lost $500 million.
WHICH the CEO took home in his pocket. He sure didn't suffer this year.

I'm curious if my rates will go DOWN once they leave the exchange. Will be interesting as this is my employers vendor of choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:03 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
the ACA should have put the health insurers out of business to begin with. Their role can be filled more efficiently and effectively by the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:07 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,063,396 times
Reputation: 3884
Actuarilly, statistics matter. Just like profits. Smart bets, good odds and cold blooded decision making matter. Successful folks get this. It is an interesting world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:08 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
If a company is projected to earn $2 billion for its shareholders and only earn $1.5 billion then YES they lost $500 million.
Exactly.

2014 profit: 4.31%
2015 Q3 profit: 3.90%

More on Obamacare problems, in general:
Quote:
"Every health plan I talk to tells me that they don't expect their Obamacare business to be profitable even in 2016 after their big rate increases. That does not bode well for the rate increases we can expect to be announced in the middle of next year's elections.

And, then there are the insolvencies of 12 of the 23 original Obamacare co-op insurance companies--the canaries in the Obamacare coal mine--with almost all of the rest of the survivors losing lots of money.

Why is this happening?

Because nowhere near enough healthy people are signing up to pay for the sick."
UnitedHealth Group Losing Big Money and Leaving the Obamacare Exchanges--Because the Obamacare Insurance Business Model Does Not Work
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:08 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,063,396 times
Reputation: 3884
Bet you live with unicorns, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
the ACA should have put the health insurers out of business to begin with. Their role can be filled more efficiently and effectively by the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:09 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Actuarilly, statistics matter. Just like profits. Smart bets, good odds and cold blooded decision making matter. Successful folks get this.


Call me crazy, but I think American health outcomes should be a higher priority than health insurer profit margins and dividend rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:09 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,518,202 times
Reputation: 10096
They are not the only ones. Atena will likely be the next one to bail, and that probably in 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:10 AM
 
45,580 posts, read 27,180,466 times
Reputation: 23889
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
the ACA should have put the health insurers out of business to begin with. Their role can be filled more efficiently and effectively by the federal government.

Yeah - we can have it like the VA...

LOL... thanks for the laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:10 AM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Bet you live with unicorns, too.
No, but they probably have seen the actual data and research showing the efficiency of it. Medicaress overhead is trivial

Other countries do this for half our costs. We're Americans, we can do better. Maybe you don't have faith in America, but I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2015, 11:10 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
You inhabit an interesting world.
Loss of profit matters to investors, which include millions of American workers and retirees who have UNH and other insurance company stocks in their pension funds and retirement accounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top