U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2015, 06:28 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
58,188 posts, read 41,018,063 times
Reputation: 29923

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
Totally makes sense on the war with Terror because them mental midgets of Islam believe if a woman kills them they lose their Heaven and afterlife, so lets go for the all Amazon Female front lines in the Middle East.
Don't worry about the fact that EVERY woman ever captured was raped or worse. Nobody in this day takes that into consideration.
Well, the current RW hero Donny boy does, he'll tell you those who get captured are losers, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2015, 06:48 AM
 
756 posts, read 339,555 times
Reputation: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDusty View Post
Agreed with 1, but I don't think anyone should be required to sign up for selective service.
I don't either but if we have equality where we are saying women are just as capable as men of being in the armed services, women should be required to sign up as well.

What I am saying is, ideally no one signs up.
If that doesn't happen, if we say we have equality and men have to sign up..so do women!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2015, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,553 posts, read 3,284,371 times
Reputation: 3801
Quote:
Originally Posted by getitgotitgood View Post
I don't either but if we have equality where we are saying women are just as capable as men of being in the armed services, women should be required to sign up as well.

What I am saying is, ideally no one signs up.
If that doesn't happen, if we say we have equality and men have to sign up..so do women!
That's valid. I disagree, but it's valid.

I assume the rational behind selective service is that should America ever be in danger, her sons, who are manly men, must take up arms or whatever. Adding women in sort of defeats that. Which, as I said, your argument is completely valid, I however strongly feel not adding more people into a faulty system is better, even if it appears unequal. With any luck, women won't be required to and this will anger people, like yourself and for valid reason, into saying it's unjust, but women will resist the requirement, and thus, the solution would have to be dissolving the system entirely. That's my ideal vision anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top