Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2015, 02:41 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
The rule is that what Conservatives desire, is BAD for the country as a whole. Republicans want to cling to their guns because of a backwards view of the 2nd Amendment, and of course this is absolutely wrong in a post-Bush world, made more dangerous by inept Republican policies here and abroad.

ALL guns should be banned and all should be confiscated. Severe penalties for violators. The NRA must take the wrong side of this argument for self-preservation.

You sir are a threat to my freedom and our liberties.
You should be confiscated and banned from the earth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2015, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
Got it. You and your cronies are scofflaws who don't obey gun laws. Thanks for sharing.

Your more than welcome. We decided that there is no such thing as a "Scary Looking" Gun, and that lack of Barrel Compensators does not cost any lives. Would you pay attention to a Law that required you to say "Mother May I," before crossing a street?


Imagine that happening. Same thing we think of your anti-gun fools that make up all these silly feel good games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Oh please. The NRA has turned into a sales org working for the gun and gun accessories industry. Their only aim is to spur the sales of more products that their primary supporters sell.

And that's why the anti-gun crowd hate them wit a passion. Because they are a sales group, right? The NRA is the Mountain standing in the road to Gun Bans. I can see why they are so frustrated, and always making up things because they can't get past the Mountain and those who support it, which dwarfs what they have. They could not even get anywhere exploiting dead people, murdered by Lunatics. That's how inept they are and it makes them mad. That's a good thing. As long as they are Mad it means the NRA and all of us are doing our duty.


Also, its good if they make money from Manufacturers. That's more money they have to fight the anti-gunners. If the anti-gun Crowd can try and make money parading dead bodies for their cause, money from sales is welcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDD View Post
Great I knew there were some other gun owners with common sense.

I got the fingerprint, background , mental health check before I could buy so should everybody else.

I am more afraid of wackos who can't pass a background check carrying a gun, than I am of any terrorists.

Hope you didn't have to pay for that check. If that's what you believe the check did not work. A "Wacko" that can not pack a Background check is already banned from buying a gun. He would know that and buy one illegally. So what do you propose? A New Law that bans a Criminal from Buying an illegal Gun? Or a "Better" Background check, that he skipped to start with? A Terrorist would kill you without a blink of the eye, yet your more afraid of a man who can't pass a background check? Really?


That thinking is irrational, and they allowed you to purchase a Gun? You should turn your guns in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:17 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,083,636 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
So great, let's just make it easy and give them the guns. Right?

The current reports on the San Bernadino shooters is that they were not sent by Isis. They were independent self-styled Isis sympathizers from what anybody knows. They could easily have gotten their guns anywhere. Too easily.

What is it with you people that want to make guns easier to get than Sudafed? Why do you have guns? For safety. How does allowing nut-jobs to have guns make you safer? The only thing I can figure is you're afraid you can't pass background checks.
What would have made it harder? Background checks were run on the legally bought firearms. How would you have kept guns out of the hands that have no criminal history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
Try looking up the meaning of the word. If you're conscious, you have an agenda.

I did look it up, and there, under examples was this. Its funny. Like I said, you folks have the Agenda. We don't. We already have the guns, have the rights, and have no plan to get what we already have. If you conscious, you should think about it and grasp the idea.


The way forward is nowhere as simple as gun-control advocates often make their agenda seem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:29 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,083,636 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Oh please. The NRA has turned into a sales org working for the gun and gun accessories industry. Their only aim is to spur the sales of more products that their primary supporters sell.
The NRA doesn't sell as many guns as Obama. With Obama selling guns so well, the NRA doesn't have to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
How do you keep the kids away from the suitcase nuke?

Stop irrational people that come up with nonsense like this from having kids.


Anyone ever notice that no gun owners or enthusiasts ever mention wanting to own Bazookas, Nukes, Machine Guns, or Explosives? Its always the anti-gun crowds fantasies. What does that tell us? Keep in mind, these are the same folks who chastise gun owners for not sitting down with them for a "Meaningful" Dialogue. These are the same people that want to Ban "Barrel Shrouds" and have no clue as to what one is. Same folks who want to Ban "Scary Looking" Guns. How would you like to be involved in that dialogue?


I think its possible that a lot of these folks are just angry because they could not pass a "Background Check" at one time, and could not buy a gun. Now they want everyone to feel their pain. Its highly possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:44 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,083,636 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
The rule is that what Conservatives desire, is BAD for the country as a whole. Republicans want to cling to their guns because of a backwards view of the 2nd Amendment, and of course this is absolutely wrong in a post-Bush world, made more dangerous by inept Republican policies here and abroad.

ALL guns should be banned and all should be confiscated. Severe penalties for violators. The NRA must take the wrong side of this argument for self-preservation.
You don't want to ban ALL guns. You want the government to still have them, so they can take them from civilians. You want the government to be able to impose its future will against its people with no way to resist.
To impose your fantasy on Americans, you will need 2/3 of both houses, and 3/4 of all state legislatures to agree with you and repeal the 2A. Good luck with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,568,438 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1 View Post
What would have made it harder? Background checks were run on the legally bought firearms. How would you have kept guns out of the hands that have no criminal history.



No Fair! You must ask questions that one can "Dance" with, not ones that include facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top