Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2015, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,481 posts, read 11,278,588 times
Reputation: 8998

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
There's something in the conservative brain that compels them to be wrong on pretty much every single issue, over nsx over again. It's pretty frightening.

Damn near every scientist believes man-made global warming is real, and even EXXON agrees with them. Conservatives? "Nope, not real. It's all librul foolishness."
Yet it's the liberal mindset that enacted (and still advocates for) the most disastrous socioeconomic failure in the history of humankind (communism).

Btw, by how much do these scientists all agree that we are causing global warming? A little, a lot? Are we causing 25% of the earth's warming? 30%, 60% 80%? Or is is only about 1%? Or maybe only .001%

Do you understand that, until a consensus forms as to what degree we are affecting global temperatures, that spouting off "Damn near every scientist believes man-made global warming is real" is a worthless utterance?


Last edited by Mr. Joshua; 12-08-2015 at 06:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2015, 06:38 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,045 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30178
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
There's something in the conservative brain that compels them to be wrong on pretty much every single issue, over nsx over again. It's pretty frightening.

Damn near every scientist believes man-made global warming is real, and even EXXON agrees with them. Conservatives? "Nope, not real. It's all librul foolishness."
There's something in the liberal brain that compels them to seek other peoples' money to feed the insatiable appetites of Fourth World dictators. See Paris "Climate" Summit; Entertainers & Politicians Push "Climate Change" Hustle for more on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,481 posts, read 11,278,588 times
Reputation: 8998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So if we believe in conventional medical treatments we won't die? lol good to know.


hey, by the way what are you doing to lessen your carbon footprint?
Maybe he is tearing up his black asphalt driveway and replacing it with crushed white shells as we speak.

....but i doubt it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:21 AM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,413,204 times
Reputation: 3765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kool Krab View Post
We know why the political donors deny it – but if you're an Average Joe conservative who is skeptical of "climate change", wouldn't you still agree that there is no harm in finding cleaner ways to do things? You might not believe that pollution contributes to climate change, but you'd likely agree that reducing pollution would lead to cleaner air that you yourself will breathe, right?

My point is that doing at least something is beneficial for everyone, irrespective of whether you believe it or not.
Why do you assume they dont? What is green usually saves green, I dont know anybody that doesnt like saving green. Drivign an old truck is generally more green than a new prius.

What do you do that makes you so superior to them? Are they heating their house and leaving the door open? Burning trash in open pits?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,258 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Yet it's the liberal mindset that enacted (and still advocates for) the most disastrous socioeconomic failure in the history of humankind (communism).

Btw, by how much do these scientists all agree that we are causing global warming? A little, a lot? Are we causing 25% of the earth's warming? 30%, 60% 80%? Or is is only about 1%? Or maybe only .001%

Do you understand that, until a consensus forms as to what degree we are affecting global temperatures, that spouting off "Damn near every scientist believes man-made global warming is real" is a worthless utterance?
Well we have a consensus as every credible scientific organization worldwide believes in climate change, so yes "a lot". What percentage do you call a consensus - 100%? NASA and the IPCC believe along with just about every research university and organization worldwide, what organization you got?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,481 posts, read 11,278,588 times
Reputation: 8998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well we have a consensus as every credible scientific organization worldwide believes in climate change, so yes "a lot". What percentage do you call a consensus - 100%? NASA and the IPCC believe along with just about every research university and organization worldwide, what organization you got?
Did you just hear that sound?

It was the wizz of my post going right over your head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:33 AM
 
Location: NC
11,222 posts, read 8,299,871 times
Reputation: 12464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
No Global Warming Alarmist has addressed my question...do you think you can stop Climate Change and control Mother Nature, if so, how?
Can it be stopped? Of course not. As you accurately point out, the climate has, and always will change naturally. What is being discussed is the human contribution to the change, which was introduced with the industrial revolution, and the effect it has had on climate change over the last couple hundred years.

If you need an example on how we CAN (and have) slow the effects of human activity, look at LA in the 1970's vs current, and then look up the smog forecast for TODAY in Beijing. Just one example of how we can reduce our effect on climate change and polution (which are linked).


Me: I am under no illusion that we can completely eliminate our effect on the climate and environment. I am not ready to give up my car (40mpg, btw), or my small but heated and cooled house, or other conveniences, and I realize that our global population's productivity and existence DEPENDS on carbon fuel at this time. But there are things that we can do. There are many examples, I gave one example of a better result.

So, Answer: No we can't stop it. Almost nobody is suggesting we can. But we CAN limit our inpact, and I feel like it's not only the right thing to do, but ultimately it has boosted (not hurt) our economy....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:42 AM
 
Location: NC
11,222 posts, read 8,299,871 times
Reputation: 12464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Did you just hear that sound?
It was the wizz of my post going right over your head.
Your post said (basically) that if you can find one little iota of anything that scientist disagree on, then you can claim that it's all bunk, and can justify doing nothing.

If one says 20% and the other says 5%, that's enough disagreement for you? Do you know if 5% or 20% or 0.0001% is enough to throw things off? I don't. My point is that percentages are irrelivant. Look at the evidence (which abounds) that we've had some negative impact. Some of it is justified (in my eyes), but what we can do to find a balance to minimize it while supporting our global population and maintaining our quality of life is a good thing. Everyone will not agree on what is right, but by having the discussion, it moves the conversation.

An analogy is Donald Trump. Most (sane) people know he's not a credible candidate, some think he is. Whatever. I would never EVER vote for him, but I am glad for his contribution to the discussion about getting money and special interest out of politics. Hillary, Cruz, etc will never all agree, but Trumps stance on this will hopefully force them all to move a little bit in the right direction. That's good. Same is true of AGW. Some will never be satisfied that enough is done, others will never admit it's a problem. But the discussion brings awareness and at least forces us to face the issue and discuss it, and do SOMETHING.

Do you get that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,258 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Did you just hear that sound?

It was the wizz of my post going right over your head.
All I hear is silence.

Now we have to poll each scientist on the degree of impact, I think we already have that anwser, bad very bad and extremely bad, what are you going to do with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...973_story.html


Outside of greed, money, and special interests, why do you think the GOP still denies climate change?
who SPECIFICLY is saying the climate doesnt change??? meanwhile you are posting someones OPINION

where has any conservative, or any other said that climate change is a myth??

actually 99% of the scientists and 99% of people understand that climate change always happens,,and the earth has warmed and cooled many,many,many, many times...all naturally


climate change is not a hoax or a myth.....but..."man-made" climate change is a hoaxthe FACT is man has extremely little to due with any climate change...99% of the scientists say that man's part is less than 5%

most rational people understand that climate change always happens,,and the earth has warmed and cooled many,many,many, many times...all naturally

1. science shows the climate changes naturally

2. science shows that climate change is natural with co2, methane, water vapor, sun cycles, rotation of the earth, earths core activity, and weather patterns all having play in it

3. science shows that the earth has warmed and cooled many, many times, with the cycles be for the most part regular....but never EXACTLY the same

4. science shows that the co2 has been much, much higher...even in cooler times

5. science (and botany ) shows that plants grow much better in higher co2....1200ppm is optimum

6. science shows that a warmer climate is not a desert climate, but a tropical wetter climate...

7. science shows that warming will be better for humans, as we will have longer growing seasons, with less need for irrigation

8 science (and botany) shows that if co2 goes below 200ppm plants stop growing

9. science shows that humans may have a SMALL part, in climate change (less than 10%)...therefore making the fascist mantra of ''man-made/man-caused"" a LIE

10. common sense shows that a carbon tax, will NOT reduce anyones carbon footprint, but will make the fascist liberal rich, richer


11. SCIENCE says that the climate changes NATURALLY....why do the big ego liberals think that man HAS TO BE the cause....especially when NOT ONE SCIENTIST has proven it to be man made/man caused


12. everyone knows (and its scientifically proven) that climate has changed many, many times

13.. and yet NOT ONE scientist has proven MANMADE global warming...science does show.. the globe evolves. The global environment changes..periodically...there have been WARMER TIMES..there have been cooler times..there have been times when C02 was MUCH, MUCH higher


14. guess what our co2 levels are currently around 380-390ppm.... co2 levels were over 700 ppm 20 thousand years ago....so what's the big deal


15. science shows us that plants would grow much better, and use less water if the co2 was HIGHER... .guess what, by science no less...the ideal co2 ppm for most plants is....900-1500 ppm.......


15a. Science shows plants exposed to elevated CO2 concentrations are likely to lose less water via transpiration, as they tend to display lower stomatal conductance.

15b. Science shows the amount of carbon gained per unit of water lost per unit leaf area - or water-use efficiency - should increase dramatically as the air's CO2 content rises.

15c. Scinece and the study of science shows In the study of Serraj et al. (1999), soybeans grown at 700 ppm CO2 displayed 10 to 25% reductions in total water loss while simultaneously exhibiting increases in dry weight of as much as 33%. So, elevated CO2 significantly increased the water-use efficiencies of the studied plants.

15d. science shows, that the typical outdoor air we breathe contains 0.03 - 0.045% (300 - 450 ppm) CO2. Research (SCIENCE) demonstrates that optimum growth and production for most plants occur between 1200 - 1500 ppm CO2.

15e. Plants under effective CO2 enrichment and management display thicker, lush green leaves, an abundance of fragrant fruit and flowers, and stronger, more vigorous roots. (this is why companys and governments SELL CO2 generators for greenhouses)


15f. science shows it is clear that as the CO2 content of the air continues to rise, nearly all of earth's agricultural species will respond favorably by exhibiting increases in water-use efficiency... which means, one can expect global agricultural productivity to rise in tandem with future increases in the atmosphere's CO2 concentration.

so more co2 is actually GREENER...its not theory, its scientific fact

16. science shows that humans use oxygen and expel (exhale) co2

17. science shows that greenery (plantlife) uses co2 and expels o2

18. science shows us that ANTARTICA was once a lush fertile land, not covered in ice

19. science shows us that Greenland was once a green lush fertile land, not covered with ice, in fact tropical like

20.. science shows us that GLACIERS created many of the geographical features that we look at today (ie Long Island was made by the lower reaching of glaciers, the great lakes were created by glaciers, the grand canyon was created by glacial melting)


21. world greenhouse gas levels lower today than 1992......and thats with the US population increasing 70 million..and world population increasing 1.6 Billion since 1992


22. cleaner air, is causing alot of the warming
Why cleaner air could speed global warming - latimes
Quote:
In what must rank as the mother of all unintended consequences, and in a finding certain to have effects on international policy, NASA scientists have found that a decrease in airborne sulfates—dirty smokestack particles caused by burning coal and regulated by the Clean Air Act since the 1970s to prevent acid rain and air pollution—may account for as much as 45% of Arctic warming. Dr. Drew Shindell of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies reports:

"Sulfates, which come primarily from the burning of coal and oil, scatter incoming solar radiation and have a net cooling effect on climate. Over the past three decades, the United States and European countries have passed a series of laws that have reduced sulfate emissions by 50%. While improving air quality and
aiding public health, the result has been less atmospheric cooling from sulfates."


Cleaner air, one of the signature achievements of the U.S. environmental movement, is certainly worth celebrating. Scientists estimate that the U.S. Clean Air Act has cut a major air pollutant called sulfate aerosols, for example, by 30% to 50% since the 1980s, helping greatly reduce cases of asthma and other respiratory problems.

But even as industrialized and developing nations alike steadily reduce aerosol pollution -- caused primarily by burning coal -- climate scientists are beginning to understand just how much these tiny particles have helped keep the planet cool. A silent benefit of sulfates, in fact, is that they've been helpfully blocking sunlight from striking the Earth for many decades, by brightening clouds and expanding their coverage. Emerging science suggests that their underappreciated impact has been incredible.

Researchers believe that natural greenhouse gases such as CO2 have committed the Earth to an eventual warming of roughly 4 degrees Fahrenheit, a quarter of which the planet has already experienced. Thanks to cooling by aerosols starting in the 1940s, however, the planet has only felt a portion of that greenhouse warming. In the 1980s, sulfate pollution dropped as Western nations enhanced pollution controls, and as a result, global warming accelerated.

There's hot debate over the size of what amounts to a cooling mask, but there's no question that it will diminish as industries continue to clean traditional pollutants from their smokestacks. Unlike CO2, which persists in the atmosphere for centuries, aerosols last for a week at most in the air. So cutting them would probably accelerate global warming rapidly.

In a recent paper in the journal Climate Dynamics, modelers forecast what would happen if nations instituted all existing pollution controls on industrial sources and vehicles by 2030. They found the current rate of warming -- roughly 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit per decade -- doubled worldwide, and nearly tripled in North America.


and finally ....common sense states that as the earths population expands, so does the need for more plantlife...to keep our oxygen levels up.......yet the global warming liberals only want to talk about car/industry exhaust; man created co2,.... and how to tax it


so endeth the lesson

the biggest thing is why do the fascist brown shirt liberals deny science, and the fact , that the truth is it is a natural occurance , and that NOTHING WE DO will change or speedup, or slow, or stop the natural climate change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top