Trump is more constitutionally correct than Obama and many Repubs (Congress, invasion)

[Dustyroad70]

The Donald strikes again!
No, Donald Trump's Immigration Plan Isn't Unconstitutional | Daily Wire

[burdell]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Perhaps you can point out WHERE the Constitution allows Congress to do so with regard to immigration?

[Ih2puo]

Originally Posted by burdell

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Perhaps you can point out WHERE the Constitution allows Congress to do so with regard to immigration?

Those refugees allowed here because of persecution of their religion and granted asylum all these years was unconstitutional.

Who knew. I'm glad you have set us all straight.

[hawkeye2009]

Originally Posted by burdell

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Perhaps you can point out WHERE the Constitution allows Congress to do so with regard to immigration?

10th Amendment:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_...s_Constitution

[eye state your name]

Hardly. Any neophyte should be aware that the Constitution does not have anything to do with non-citizens. D'uh.

[eye state your name]

Originally Posted by burdell

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Perhaps you can point out WHERE the Constitution allows Congress to do so with regard to immigration?

Um, again, the US Constitution does NOT CONFER rights on NONCITIZENS.

[Cheesesteak Cravings]

We banned the asians from immigrating. Not sure why we ever repealed that that act.

[Leo58]

Originally Posted by eye state your name

Um, again, the US Constitution does NOT CONFER rights on NONCITIZENS.

The US Constitution does not CONFER rights on ANYONE. It only states what the government can and cannot do. Your rights do not derive from the constitution.

The constitution says the government cannot interfere with free exercise of religion. It doesn't differentiate between citizens and non-citizens in that clause.

[epliny]

Originally Posted by burdell

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Perhaps you can point out WHERE the Constitution allows Congress to do so with regard to immigration?

Islam is in direct conflict with our constitution.
Why?

Islam is a Theocracy, a form of government based upon a religious belief!

Funny how libs, and apparently you are bent out of shape if someone says our country is based on Christian values but have no problem with an invading foreign government invasion?

As far as congress, the people or the constitution is concerned when it comes to blocking immigration .. for any reason?

Here:

Immigration and Nationality Act INA § 212(f):

(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.


This power is universal, enforceable at the will of the president, and applies any time for any circumstance.

[Cheesesteak Cravings]

Originally Posted by epliny

Islam is a Theocracy, a form of government based upon a religious belief

Islam is not a theocracy anymore than Christianity is, so your statement doesn't make sense.