Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-27-2015, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
LOL, really? All you need today to confirm that the climate is warming is to watch or read the news once in awhile....How long can you continue to ignore the obvious?
Yes, it is obvious that satellite data shows little or no warming;

Satellite data from the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) group also shows a prolonged “hiatus” in global warming. After November of this year, RSS data will be in its 22nd year without warming. Ironically, the so-called “hiatus” in warming started when then vice President Al Gore and environmental groups touted RSS satellite data as evidence a slight warming trend since 1979.

Read more: The Earth Has Entered Its 21st Year Without Global Warming | The Daily Caller

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2015, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,521 posts, read 37,121,123 times
Reputation: 13998
The graph you posted actually does show warming.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-conte...versus-RSS.gif

In any case over 90% of warming is being absorbed by the oceans.. http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/wp-c...-3.1-Fig-1.png

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...TheHeatOfGloba

You are only fooling yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2015, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Yes, it is obvious that satellite data shows little or no warming;

Satellite data from the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) group also shows a prolonged “hiatus” in global warming. After November of this year, RSS data will be in its 22nd year without warming. Ironically, the so-called “hiatus” in warming started when then vice President Al Gore and environmental groups touted RSS satellite data as evidence a slight warming trend since 1979.

Read more: The Earth Has Entered Its 21st Year Without Global Warming | The Daily Caller

Now where did the good Dr Roy Spenser acquire that draft from, I don't see it on the NOAA site.

I give you credit at least he is a climate scientist and doesn't appear to be funded by big oil but has some real unscientific statements. He is one of these evagelists that believes Intelligent Design is on equal footing with evolution, that doesn't disqualify him but certainly is cause for astonishment.
“We have no idea what's natural and what's man made. […] There is no fingerprint of human-caused warming.” [32]

"I finally became convinced that the theory of creation actually had a much better scientific basis than the theory of evolution, for the creation model was actually better able to explain the physical and biological complexity in the world..."

"My long term prediction is that eventually we are going to realise that more CO2 in the atmosphere is actually a good thing"

"I believe the day is approaching when it will be time to make public the evidence of biased peer review."




So where did he get the graph you posted, why not a link back to the NOAA site?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2015, 05:59 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
The AGW alarmists don't like satellite observations because those readings don't support their agenda. But what about the huge number of weather stations that have been compromised by building, HVAC, etc?
-------------------
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s reliance on poorly-sited weather stations to calculate surface temperatures is inflating the warming trend of the U.S. and maybe even the rest of the world, according to a landmark study looking at three decades of data.

“The majority of weather stations used by NOAA to detect climate change temperature signal have been compromised by encroachment of artificial surfaces like concrete, asphalt, and heat sources like air conditioner exhausts,” Anthony Watts, a seasoned meteorologist and lead author of the study, said in a statement Thursday.

These “compromised” weather stations run hotter than stations that are well-sited, and are used by NOAA as a benchmark to make upward adjustments for other weather stations that are part of the agency’s official temperature record.

Watts and his fellow researchers found only 410 “unperturbed” weather stations out of the 1,218 stations used by NOAA to determine U.S. climate trends. These “unperturbed” stations don’t need to be adjusted by NOAA because they had not been moved, had any equipment changes, or change in the time temperatures were observed.

Read more: NOAA


"adjusted data" Code for: Manipulated test results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2015, 09:57 AM
 
13,304 posts, read 7,864,463 times
Reputation: 2142
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
LOL, really? All you need today to confirm that the climate is warming is to watch or read the news once in awhile....How long can you continue to ignore the obvious?

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/msu/

Obviate the dissenting thermometers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 02:49 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
Why are you making libelous claims? Popular Technology.net does not promote any conspiracy theories but instead readily debunks them. We have resources challenging 911, JFK and Moon Landing conspiracy theories.
Sure Andrew. Just look at all your links to other conspiracy blogs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 02:59 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
While Cook was doodling, I was employed in a real computer science field and received a scientific education at my University.

Despite your libelous claims, Popular Technology.net actually debunks conspiracy theories. We have resources challenging 911, JFK and Moon Landing conspiracy theories.

Popular Technology.net is an impartial, highly cited website referenced by over 300 independent sources throughout more than 25 countries in books and scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major and regional news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, political institutions, on radio and by the technology community.

This includes 10 times in scholarly peer-reviewed journals: The Impact of Popular Technology.net
Impartial? lololol! Did you write that yourself?

All I have to do is look at your 'global warming' links to other crank magnet anti-science conspiracy blogs and far right industry funded propoganda sources. No links to any legitimate science organizations on climate change.

Last edited by Ceist; 12-29-2015 at 03:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 03:32 PM
 
114 posts, read 137,976 times
Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Sure Andrew. Just look at all your links to other conspiracy blogs.
We do not link to any conspiracy blogs despite your libelous claims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 03:43 PM
 
114 posts, read 137,976 times
Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Impartial?
This is correct, "impartial" - "not connected to or influenced by one particular person or group".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
All I have to do is look at your 'global warming' links to other crank magnet anti-science conspiracy blogs and far right industry funded propoganda sources. No links to any legitimate science organizations on climate change.
Despite your libelous claims, none of those are "crank magnets", "anti-science", "conspiracy blogs" or "far-right industry funded propaganda". Thankfully, you do not determine what a "legitimate science organization on climate change" is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2015, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,521 posts, read 37,121,123 times
Reputation: 13998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech View Post
We do not link to any conspiracy blogs despite your libelous claims.
You do not link to any valid climate science sites, contrary to your claims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top