Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There Is no way to accurately compare the temperature from sensors used 100 years ago to those used today.
Sure you can. You just make replicas of 'sensors' used 100 years ago and place them next to current 'sensors'. Overlapping records using different methods and equipment can also be used for calibration. Scientist also compare temperatures of a range of different natural proxies: ice cores, ocean and lake sediments, boreholes, corals etc.
Sure you can. You just make replicas of 'sensors' used 100 years ago and place them next to current 'sensors'. Overlapping records using different methods and equipment can also be used for calibration. Scientist also compare temperatures of a range of different natural proxies: ice cores, ocean and lake sediments, boreholes, corals etc.
See how it sounds from the other point of view, hypocrite?
Nice try, but a poor attempt on your part. I am always open to science because the point of science is to always question research in order to get more accurate research.
See how it sounds from the other point of view, hypocrite?
It'd be great if Watt or any number of bloggers could actually put forth a paper that puts it in doubt....
But alas... it's much easier to be merely a blogger....
Last edited by dv1033; 12-20-2015 at 06:16 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.