Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-01-2016, 06:32 PM
 
46,261 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
It's still classified....




Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
What is? He looked at it on a screen.

Does that matter?






Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
By who's authority. It has no words or text in common with the original communication.

You tell us, you are the one saying it does not matter.




Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
He wrote it. So he has to classify it? Based on SofS authority is the only way that could happen. It contains original analysis though with insight from classified knowledge.
Who wrote what?





Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
It is an original work of the State Dept. Therefore the province of the SofS.
No it's not.




Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
I have never been able to figure out if that is true or not. Petreaus after all is a plea bargain...and his friend was very well cleared. I suspect he might well have fought it and won...but risked a felony and lots of bad publicity if he did.
Not our fault..

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Much of the press suggests Petreaus got a sweetheart deal. He could easily have been charged with multiple felonies that did not involve classified material.
Wait, are you saying that petreaus did not share classified information with the other lady he was with,even though she had a security clearance?


Then why was he given probation and fined money?


LOL.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2016, 04:23 AM
 
26,469 posts, read 15,053,236 times
Reputation: 14617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
Yeah, it was a lie.
She told Ellen that she had three devices.
And the email dumps have revealed that she has used at least 3 devices to email.

Hillary is a liar that jeopardized US secrets to protect her own secrets. Now sheep want to make her president for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 04:48 AM
 
27,119 posts, read 15,300,057 times
Reputation: 12055
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
And the email dumps have revealed that she has used at least 3 devices to email.

Hillary is a liar that jeopardized US secrets to protect her own secrets. Now sheep want to make her president for it.

Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 05:42 AM
 
5,472 posts, read 3,222,624 times
Reputation: 3935
Much of the general population can't even afford the type of security Ms. Clinton had on her server. This is not some run of the mill person who had an inhouse server. Geez people, Stop chasing drama and madness as if to be ignorant. This woman had connections and access to the best security people in the nation !!!!!! One would be insane not to have taken advice from these people before setting up a private server at that level of position and function. But, she is not going to tell you that, nor should she tell you that. !!!!!! There is no earthly reason why she'd disclose such intricate information to the general public or anyone else.

The average person can't afford the type of security she had on her personal server.
If it was weak, someone would have hacked it long ago, but that NEVER happened and was not likely to happen.

Beating a dead horse one achieves only becoming tired, because the horse won't get up again.

Don't be foolish and fall for more "drama and deflection games", stick with learning about the principles of forward agenda for the nation. Not drama sequences meant to collude the mind with things no one can do anything about.

There are so many people who have laptops with access to both job intranets, gov. intranets and if there is some weak link, that would be it. But even those are guarded as closely as people can manage.

Wake up people_ stop being pushed and pulled by "mad man drama games"- stick to the facts that truly are about the future of American and the prospering of the nation, its people and the lives of such as it relates to improving this nations stature and stand, that really matters.

Enough of the Dog and Pony show!!!!!
Be adults and think in terms of a world far beyond what you are aware of, because that is exactly how advanced the levels of government is, which you have no privileged to know about, and certainly do not have a valid need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 06:02 AM
 
2,295 posts, read 2,367,680 times
Reputation: 2668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance and Change View Post
Much of the general population can't even afford the type of security Ms. Clinton had on her server. This is not some run of the mill person who had an inhouse server. Geez people, Stop chasing drama and madness as if to be ignorant. This woman had connections and access to the best security people in the nation !!!!!! One would be insane not to have taken advice from these people before setting up a private server at that level of position and function. But, she is not going to tell you that, nor should she tell you that. !!!!!! There is no earthly reason why she'd disclose such intricate information to the general public or anyone else.

The average person can't afford the type of security she had on her personal server.
If it was weak, someone would have hacked it long ago, but that NEVER happened and was not likely to happen.

Beating a dead horse one achieves only becoming tired, because the horse won't get up again.

Don't be foolish and fall for more "drama and deflection games", stick with learning about the principles of forward agenda for the nation. Not drama sequences meant to collude the mind with things no one can do anything about.

There are so many people who have laptops with access to both job intranets, gov. intranets and if there is some weak link, that would be it. But even those are guarded as closely as people can manage.

Wake up people_ stop being pushed and pulled by "mad man drama games"- stick to the facts that truly are about the future of American and the prospering of the nation, its people and the lives of such as it relates to improving this nations stature and stand, that really matters.

Enough of the Dog and Pony show!!!!!
Be adults and think in terms of a world far beyond what you are aware of, because that is exactly how advanced the levels of government is, which you have no privileged to know about, and certainly do not have a valid need to know.
So now the mantra is "stop paying attention to Hillary's disregard for the law, her obvious efforts thwart the FOIA process, her disregard for national security, and her repeated lying on the matter, let's just get past her felonious actions and move the nation forward"....wow.....that is a change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 06:14 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,155,879 times
Reputation: 55000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance and Change View Post

The average person can't afford the type of security she had on her personal server.
If it was weak, someone would have hacked it long ago, but that NEVER happened and was not likely to happen.
And you're 100% positive no one - The Chinese or Russians never hacked that bathroom server she used?

You don't know this and it completely voids your argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,847,737 times
Reputation: 4585
I think you people need to replace this tired phony scandal with a new one .... I am sure you can make one up pretty easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 06:30 AM
 
2,295 posts, read 2,367,680 times
Reputation: 2668
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think you people need to replace this tired phony scandal with a new one .... I am sure you can make one up pretty easily.
Morning Bob. Here's the issue with your statement, it holds no water. There is clear evidence that Clinton, and her staff, have illegally stored/sent classified data on an unclassified network. To add to that already serious violation of law, Secretary Clinton has continually lied to Congress, and the American people regarding this issue. In just that past three weeks, it's become clear that Clinton directed a deputy to remove classification markings from a document and transmit it to her unclassified network, 22 emails were discovered that contain TS/SAP data, and Obama's statement that he "heard about this on the news" has been proven false as 18 emails were discovered from Obama to Clinton on her homebrew network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,729,827 times
Reputation: 6593
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I think you people need to replace this tired phony scandal with a new one .... I am sure you can make one up pretty easily.
LOL, I expect that's what most Republicans were saying when Nixon was being investigated for Watergate. Little biased there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2016, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,946 posts, read 13,328,106 times
Reputation: 14005
Gotta laugh at the Hillary defenders.


She is a totally corrupt POS criminal who belongs in prison, and you all know it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top