Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2016, 01:28 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
If you're referring to Lily Ledbetter, it was designed to overturn the Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter Vs. Goodyear which made the fair pay act of 1963 much less viable. If you're referring to more recent proposals, they're more or less further protections such as prohibiting employers from penalizing employees for sharing information about their salaries, permitting compensatory and punitive damages, etc. I think that it may be a bit of overkill, but then again, if there was complete compliance, all laws would be redundant.
Making laws off one arguable case makes for bad laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2016, 01:29 PM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,995,939 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post


No, the answer to a law not being enforced is NOT to make another law. The answer is to enforce the law.


Then you'll be happy to know that in 2010 President Obama created The National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force which brings together the EEOC, the DOJ, the DOL, and the OPM to enforce the law. NO? I'm not surprised.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 01:40 PM
 
2,962 posts, read 4,995,939 times
Reputation: 1887
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Making laws off one arguable case makes for bad laws.
I think that is a matter of opinion. There have been so many. I think Dredd Scott would be considered a bad decision by almost everyone today. But how about Brown Vs Board of Education or Citizens United? I think they would have opposing camps still.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:22 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
Then you'll be happy to know that in 2010 President Obama created The National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force which brings together the EEOC, the DOJ, the DOL, and the OPM to enforce the law. NO? I'm not surprised.
I support the administration enforcing the laws. Too bad it so rarely happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:23 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
I think that is a matter of opinion. There have been so many. I think Dredd Scott would be considered a bad decision by almost everyone today. But how about Brown Vs Board of Education or Citizens United? I think they would have opposing camps still.
Her superiors said it was performance based. She said it was because she was a woman. The law never did get decided on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:35 PM
 
5,097 posts, read 2,312,233 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryWho? View Post
Did you bother reading the article I posted? Maybe it's you who is the clinging vine... An anecdotal theory covering 2 occupations is hardly empirical evidence. Hardly worth taking your saviors name in vain...
Oh, okay. The fact that most surgeons are men and that most big-law firm partners are also men is an "anecdotal theory." And if you read some of the comments on that article you'll find many people who wrote the same thing that I did, and point out how that article is bunk.
You see, this is how politicians get away with this sort of demagoguery: by appealing to people who don't even know how to analyze things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 02:44 PM
 
5,097 posts, read 2,312,233 times
Reputation: 3338
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Hillary wasn't President of the United States was she?
Exactly. There may be a reason why a woman "memoirist" may be paid less than a male "memoirist." And it's not necessarily discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,219,897 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I support the administration enforcing the laws. Too bad it so rarely happens.
I wouldn't mind Congress saying they won't pass any more laws/spending until the President actually enforces the laws on the book, starting with illegal immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:51 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
I wouldn't mind Congress saying they won't pass any more laws/spending until the President actually enforces the laws on the book, starting with illegal immigration.
They are too addicted to making new laws and spending money they don't have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2016, 03:55 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc View Post
Also what Obama is trying to do is get companies to release salary data. That's invasive.
That's the real crux for the socialist pigs. If they know compensation then they can demagogue and force, though coercion (what governments do best besides war) whoever to explain in public their business decisions (or someone else's decision who no longer works at a company, which includes you if you're reading this) so that every loud mouth liberal rat-finks can make it headlines news on their state run media.

Like with Crackafornia's new "fair" pay law employers can no longer discipline employees who talk about pay amongst themselves. This opens up legal snooping and gossip in the work place sanctioned by the state of Crackafornia and reported to the world via loud mouth liberal rat-finks on Twanker, Fakebook, MyDisgrace and Blogs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top