Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2016, 10:02 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,522,497 times
Reputation: 14945

Advertisements

Questions for the progressives on this thread. Do you support the framework/tenets/ideals of the British system, the Canadian system, or neither? If neither, then is there another country that has a system in place that you admire? If so, which country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2016, 10:22 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,360,513 times
Reputation: 14459
When I think of straight talk with the well-being of humans as a priority I immediately look to see what insurance companies have to say on a matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2016, 10:55 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,958,439 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
On to single-payer, Medicare for all................she can get it done!

Maybe they KNEW that Osamacare would be the push that was needed to progress to single-payer?

Hillary 2016, year of the Woman!
She's made it clear that... Well let me re phrase that, she had made the calculated decision to attack single payer.

In facts it's been her biggest attack on Sanders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,163,062 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
Questions for the progressives on this thread. Do you support the framework/tenets/ideals of the British system, the Canadian system, or neither? If neither, then is there another country that has a system in place that you admire? If so, which country?
There's a lot of ignorance about the subject matter.

All national healthcare systems are universal healthcare systems, but not all universal healthcare systems are national healthcare systems.

There are two primary systems of healthcare: Bismarck and Beveridge.

The Beveridge System is national healthcare, as practiced in the UK, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.

The Beveridge System is illegal in the US according to the Supreme Court's Sebelius decision, see National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, US Supreme Court 183 L. Ed. 2d 450 (2012)

The Canadian system is an hybrid of the Beveridge System and thus illegal in the US.

The Bismarck System and hybrids of the system are universal healthcare systems practiced by Germany, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, etc etc etc.

The Bismarck System may be legal in the US, under certain specific conditions.

Neither doctors nor hospitals can be forced into a Medicare-for-All plan, and there are prior court rulings dealing with it.

Best case scenario, a universal system that permits an opt-out for everyone.

That would create a two-tiered system, one for private insurance, who would get the best care, and then one for everyone else on the government system, which would require rationing of healthcare, or the federal debt gets bloated and you run into financial and economic problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,632 posts, read 10,388,492 times
Reputation: 19524
I'm no expert on health insurance. I do know, however, the government made a mess of the VA health care, a significantly smaller population than single payer health care for all citizens. Common sense says the government would create the same mess it did for veterans if Medicare for all is implemented.

Nothing is free. No program the government runs is efficient.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,746,321 times
Reputation: 5764
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
On to single-payer, Medicare for all................she can get it done!

Maybe they KNEW that Osamacare would be the push that was needed to progress to single-payer?

Hillary 2016, year of the Woman!
She is a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,746,321 times
Reputation: 5764
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Getting rid of the ACA while not covering folks, if done on a GOP party line, will be the last time the GOP will have a majority in the house and senate for a generation.
I agree. The GOP has not demonstrated much in the intelligence department. We need a third, common sense party.....now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,746,321 times
Reputation: 5764
Single payer will work if we can finally get rid of the Medicare/Medicaid fraud and abuse. Everyone pays something towards it and it can work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,886,908 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Getting rid of the ACA while not covering folks, if done on a GOP party line, will be the last time the GOP will have a majority in the house and senate for a generation.
actually, dems have done horrible in House and Senate elections ever since they imposed ACA on our nation on a party line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 11:42 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Blue Shield was one of the companies complicit in rigging and royally screwing up the healthcare system that we have to live with now, along with Blue Cross and the American Hospital Association
Along with Blue Cross?
Blue Cross / Blue Shield...

Blue Shield is the original name, before the lobbyiost made sure it would be for profit and a cash cow.

Show me the money! You get into the politicians pocket, you can have anything you wish.... I'll be dead soon and I need to live it up while I can, said the politician.

Blue cross, is Blue Shield..


The reason it could not be for-profit before, was because it is a pyramid scheme and they were illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top