Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2016, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
"Eric Snowden"? Edward Snowden.
Yes, but this site does not allow you to correct the thread title. Sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2016, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
If that were true, why did he run?

Because he knew what he was doing was WRONG!!!
OH? Kinda like Jews running from Hitler? Got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 09:38 PM
 
858 posts, read 707,754 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Asked and answered.

Apples and oranges. In the house lives would be saved.


Snowden very likely got people killed.

How? I personally don't mind the government getting that information WITH A WARRANT. I also wouldn't have minded if this was discussed in Congress and the powers were granted. I wouldn't have agreed with it but at least there's a recourse to overturn that decision in the future. To say Snowden got people killed is asanine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 04:45 AM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,839,139 times
Reputation: 6650
He should not have revealed any activities we do outside of the USA. If any whistle blowing was needed it was regarding unconstitutional activities done to US Citizens within the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 05:10 PM
 
Location: honolulu
1,729 posts, read 1,537,017 times
Reputation: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahboy79 View Post
How? I personally don't mind the government getting that information WITH A WARRANT. I also wouldn't have minded if this was discussed in Congress and the powers were granted. I wouldn't have agreed with it but at least there's a recourse to overturn that decision in the future. To say Snowden got people killed is asanine.
ok, put you in these guys shoes...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaK-HKIdv1E





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkB6-CmyraE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 05:44 PM
 
Location: honolulu
1,729 posts, read 1,537,017 times
Reputation: 450

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7YHJdCnNm0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 05:54 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,960,029 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Jesselyn Radack was the ethics attorney for the Justice Department. Her first hand experience is about as factual and telling as is possible. You should read the entire interview. Here is an excerpt.
--------------------
Would National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden be better off had he gone through official channels to expose his employer's questionable domestic surveillance practices? No way, says his lawyer, Jesselyn Radack of ExposeFacts.org. And she should know: The national security and human rights attorney has represented numerous other government whistleblowers and even acted as one herself.

Q: Some of your clients went through what channels seemed to be official at the time.

A: Thomas Drake went through every conceivable internal channel about a number of surveillance programs. He went to his boss. He went to the NSA general counsel. He went to the House and Senate intelligence committees. And not only did they fail to redress his concern, they turned around and prosecuted him for espionage. So for all the people out there shouting that Edward Snowden should have gone through the proper channels, first o f all, there are not that many channels for national security whistleblowers. They are excluded from most avenues. But second of all, Tom Drake, Bill Binney, Kirk Wiebe, and Ed Loomis did go through the proper channels. And all of them fell under criminal investigation for having done so.

Defending the Whistleblowers - Reason.com
Who is Thomas Drake?
I never heard of him till now


Also, the NSA works for their puppet masters Globalist ambitions, not for this country
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Who is Thomas Drake?
I never heard of him till now


Also, the NSA works for their puppet masters Globalist ambitions, not for this country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top