Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It seems like most of the Republican candidates have spoken about Obama's unconstitutional executive orders, and how they would revoke them on day one of their presidency. Is there someone who can explain to me how these executive orders work in the first place, and more importantly, what makes them unconstitutional? (I am a lawyer admitted to practice in two states, so it's not like I'm dumb, but more like I'm ignorant ). Please educate me on the evil ways as to how this executive works. Thanks.
They are intended to be used as a temporary measure for extenuating circumstances when Congress is not in session. Unfortunately, Congress has become so incompetent that it is easy for a President to get away with whatever he wants.
Well, it's circular. No matter how much Republicans in Congress cry about it, Obama's executive orders are presumptively constitutional until the Supreme Court declares them otherwise. No one else can settle this.
Of course they're not. Several former presidents have made ten times as many executive orders as Obama.
Again with the numbers, as though all Executive Orders are equal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.