Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do not care how it 'looks' for the RNC to ban guns inside the arena. It is simple common sense.
Totally disagree. What about all the "good guys with guns" who would be there to protect the candidates? Republicans have been preaching for years that the public should trust its security to them. What's the problem?
Totally disagree. What about all the "good guys with guns" who would be there to protect the candidates? Republicans have been preaching for years that the public should trust its security to them. What's the problem?
The problem is, they know their constituency far too well to want to see them show up armed, and they know that what they have been saying under orders from the NRA is total BS.
The problem is, they know their constituency far too well to want to see them show up armed, and they know that what they have been saying under orders from the NRA is total BS.
Well goodness; that means there's hope for them yet. They're not as stupid as they appear.
The problem is, they know their constituency far too well to want to see them show up armed, and they know that what they have been saying under orders from the NRA is total BS.
So are you actually admitting NRA bloviation of Gun's make people safe is a bunch of BS?
IF true..Then GOP is afraid of those sanctioned by them as actually a danger to a conference of the elite/Delegates/Candidates/Party members ... Revelation abound..LOL
All I can say is.."HYP-Opracy" personified when the Party of NRA actually acknowledges the DANGERS??
Great boon for those who want to get some sort of gun regulatory actions..SMH!!
Interesting indeed!
Damn, the secret service says no guns at the RNC because it will be less safe. What does the secret service know about guns? Are they another liberal anti-gun group?
The NRA has consistently said that more guns make everything safer, and that has been the line taken by every one of the republicans after every mass shooting that has occurred. It only stands to reason that more guns at the convention would make it safer as well.
Exactly. Since the GOP is so pro-gun, they should require guns by every single attendee and have ammo booths just to be really safe.
Damn, the secret service says no guns at the RNC because it will be less safe. What does the secret service know about guns? Are they another liberal anti-gun group?
the secret service is not antigun, but rather pro protection of presidential candidates, just like they are about protecting the president. nice try but you fail.
the secret service is not antigun, but rather pro protection of presidential candidates, just like they are about protecting the president. nice try but you fail.
So basically they don't believe in the "good guy" with a gun Republican myth.
Shouldn't guns make the Republican National Convention the safest place on earth?
It certainly will be one of the safest. You'll have hundreds of armed LEO from various agencies and hundreds of Secret Service agents armed with who knows what.
When the average citizen has that kind of protection then we can have a discussion about getting rid of the Second Amendment.
It certainly will. You'll have hundreds of armed LE from various agencies and hundreds of Secret Service agents armed with who knows what.
So basically trained professional folks, not some crazy Republicans with an unhealthy fetish for the 2nd amendment and a raging anti-obama hard-on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.