Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think it addressed your point just fine, I can handle their opinions, that doesn't change the fact that I think they are whacko's.
Sorry if that is so offensive to you.
I'm just trying to understand. It makes no sense to me. It's kinda like wearing your pants down around your knee's. I don't get it. I realize that those who do it get something out of it but no one has really explained what.
Quote:
And it still doesn't change the fact that the Bernie crowd is by far the most vocal in trying to silence anyone they disagree with. Look at the Trump rallies, look at the BLM at Clinton events, look at campuses where they try to silence anyone who dare speak of Israel in a positive light. The list goes on and on. That my friend is not being able to handle a different opinion, not RubyTwo jokingly calling them whackos.
You are just making crap up. I don't understand this tactic either. It was done to the Tea Party also.....no matter what happened that one saw as negative it was somehow, no matter how thin tied to the Tea Party.
I'm just trying to understand. It makes no sense to me. It's kinda like wearing your pants down around your knee's. I don't get it. I realize that those who do it get something out of it but no one has really explained what.
You are just making crap up. I don't understand this tactic either. It was done to the Tea Party also.....no matter what happened that one saw as negative it was somehow, no matter how thin tied to the Tea Party.
As I note, seems immature and insecure to me.
WTF does the tea party have to do with any of this.
As per usual you are out of your element. Everything I previously wrote can be proven... Bernie supports shut down the Trump rally in Chicago, BLM has tried to hijack HIllary events numerous times, students at San Francisco State University just yesterday shutdown an event with the Mayor of Jerusalem.
You were upset that I couldnt handle different opinions because I used a mean name in regards to Bernie supporters. I refuted that and countered by showing counter points how the Bernie crowd are the ones who can not handle different opinions.
WTF does the tea party have to do with any of this.
I explained.
Quote:
As per usual you are out of your element. Everything I previously wrote can be proven... Bernie supports shut down the Trump rally in Chicago, BLM has tried to hijack HIllary events numerous times, students at university of San Francisco just yesterday shutdown an event with the Mayor of Jerusalem.
Per usual? Granted no one can keep track of everyone but I don't recall interacting before. I can understand why if your regular style is just making things up.
Per usual? Granted no one can keep track of everyone but I don't recall interacting before. I can understand why if your regular style is just making things up.
What didn't you? More important is that you haven't explained the need for name calling.
Because this is the internet and I can jokingly refer to people as whackos if I see fit.
Again, sorry if this is so offensive to you.
Prove to me how I made up that Bernie supporers shut down Trump in Chicago, BLM has tried to cause trouble at Hillary events, and San Francisco State shut down an event with the mayor of Jerusalem.
I understand what he's saying but he's ignoring theeir point that the legislation targeted the "poor" drugs (crack) more than the "rich" drugs (cocaine) and that poor people's lives were ruined for desperate choices made in youth while their rich counterparts were spared. Still they're not defending the dealing of drugs and murder; they're saying that a lot of people were profiled and railroaded and undeserving of life sentences for minor offenses and those people's lives matter. Condemning the unjust mass incarceration of hordes of minor offenders is not the same as defending major offenders. He knows that but damn if he's going to admit fault. On the other side, the protesters should know that the ends don't always show intentions. MAYBE Clinton really was just trying to get rid of drugs, and his legislation had unforseen (to him) consequences. If he and Hilary would just admit that, folks might ease up on them. Like level with us, dude/dudette. No? Never?! Okay, well the show will go on...
I understand what he's saying but he's ignoring theeir point that the legislation targeted the "poor" drugs (crack) more than the "rich" drugs (cocaine) and that poor people's lives were ruined for desperate choices made in youth while their rich counterparts were spared. Still they're not defending the dealing of drugs and murder; they're saying that a lot of people were profiled and railroaded and undeserving of life sentences for minor offenses and those people's lives matter. Condemning the unjust mass incarceration of hordes of minor offenders is not the same as defending major offenders. He knows that but damn if he's going to admit fault. On the other side, the protesters should know that the ends don't always show intentions. MAYBE Clinton really was just trying to get rid of drugs, and his legislation had unforseen (to him) consequences. If he and Hilary would just admit that, folks might ease up on them. Like level with us, dude/dudette. No? Never?! Okay, well the show will go on...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
