Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2016, 06:21 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20883

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
No.

Before government intervention (and socialism), many private charities operated hospitals and clinics.

The poor got "free" or low cost care, but had to endure the lesser accommodations of an open ward, whereas the "paying customers" got private rooms.
In some hospitals and clinics, the staff were religious ZEALOTS who worked for NO remuneration, viciously caring for the sick and dying. (sarcasm flag off)

Funny thing, you don't hear about people being bankrupted by medical costs BEFORE the glorious socialist revolution. . .

Move on, nothing to see here, go home.
And do you expect:

1. physcians to undergo post high school education for 13 years and work for free?

2. nurses, techs, and support staff to work for free?

3. In the era of "charity hospitals", medicine did not have expensive MRIs,CTs, chemotherapeutics, surgeries were very limited in scope and medicines were quite primitive.

4. Do you expect MRIs, CTs, anesthesia machines, OR tables, instruments, pharmaceuticals, and disposables all to appear for "free"?


Your contentions reflect the sentiments of one who harbors jealousy and resentment toward the medical profession. You are probably one who had designs to go to medical school, but could not achieve a high enough GPA and MCATs to do so. There is a good reason that the bar is set at a certain level- many people are just not cut out to be physicains either intellectually or emotionally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2016, 08:43 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,489,598 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarina Witt View Post
I don't believe everything I hear about Canada. I haven't said anything about the Canadian health care system on this thread. If you want to believe swine like Mercola, you'll lose your cred faster than you can say "Jack Robinson".
Was Mercola the only link I posted?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 10:48 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
^^No, you posted a couple of other "National Enquirer" type links about medical errors in the post I was responding to. A quack, and hysteria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 07:05 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,489,598 times
Reputation: 16962
the Henry J Kaiser institute and Healthcare IT News and Physicians for a National Healthcare Plan using cites from sources like the CDC aren't acceptable to you?'

It ain't my credibility you need to worry about.

However we'll just try again with a couple more of the hundreds I've found Perhaps you'll find at least one of them acceptable to your lofty standards. I won't hold my breath while you continue sipping your KoolAde:

https://www.justice.org/what-we-do/a...medical-errors

Hospital Errors are the Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S., and New Hospital Safety Scores Show Improvements Are Too Slow

https://www.propublica.org/article/h...n-us-hospitals

Here's a couple that should cause some concern:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/he...inds.html?_r=0

Do Hospitals Profit From Surgical Errors? | Physician's Weekly for Medical News, Journals & Articles

Medical Errors Higher at For-Profit than Not-for-Profit Hospitals, Harvard Study Finds | Physicians for a National Health Program

Then there's another facet:

Most Highly Paid Health Insurance Executives - Business Insider

Top health insurance bosses earn millions - Connecticut Post

New disclosures show MVP denied 15.5 percent of patient claims in 2012; Blue Cross denied 7.6 percent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
the Henry J Kaiser institute and Healthcare IT News and Physicians for a National Healthcare Plan using cites from sources like the CDC aren't acceptable to you?'

It ain't my credibility you need to worry about.

However we'll just try again with a couple more of the hundreds I've found Perhaps you'll find at least one of them acceptable to your lofty standards. I won't hold my breath while you continue sipping your KoolAde:

https://www.justice.org/what-we-do/a...medical-errors

Hospital Errors are the Third Leading Cause of Death in U.S., and New Hospital Safety Scores Show Improvements Are Too Slow

https://www.propublica.org/article/h...n-us-hospitals

Here's a couple that should cause some concern:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/he...inds.html?_r=0

Do Hospitals Profit From Surgical Errors? | Physician's Weekly for Medical News, Journals & Articles

Medical Errors Higher at For-Profit than Not-for-Profit Hospitals, Harvard Study Finds | Physicians for a National Health Program

Then there's another facet:

Most Highly Paid Health Insurance Executives - Business Insider

Top health insurance bosses earn millions - Connecticut Post

New disclosures show MVP denied 15.5 percent of patient claims in 2012; Blue Cross denied 7.6 percent
What does all this hospital/medical error shtick have to do with UHC? Are you saying that never happens in UHC countries?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,818 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32952
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
The big question is how to pay and who is going to pay. Nothing else matters until those two questions can be answered.
Wrong. What matters more than either of those questions is keeping people healthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,818 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32952
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Most countries rewrote their Constitutions after WW2 and determined healthcare was a human right.

Healthcare is not a human right in the US.

We do however enjoy taking other countries to task for human rights violations unless they are an ally, in which case we overlook their transgressions.
I don't agree with your assessment.

It is not a Constitutional right. It is a human right. And we can make anything a right that we want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,818 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32952
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
...
d. the average physician is more intelligent than the average citizen
...
6. I would LOVE to be an employee with no overhead. Can you find me that position locally?
That seems very debatable sometimes.

As far as #6, isn't that why so many doctors join HMOs, for example. Or the general medical practice I go to -- one owner, 4 regular doctors, 4 NPs, 4 specialists that spend part of each week there.

Last edited by phetaroi; 04-19-2016 at 10:12 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,818 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32952
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
And yet when you're sick do you go see your doctor or your handy man? Intelligence aside, I can assure you that anyone who gets through college, the MCAT, med school and residency is damn hard working and committed to becoming a doctor. The average citizen either is not intelligent enough or doesn't want to work hard enough to attain a medical degree. Doesn't really matter which.
No, simply because most of us, at one time or another, have had lousy doctors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,818 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32952
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm
Physicians are NOT more intelligent than the average citizen. Most apply knowledge from trial and error from generations of doctors that came before them. Memorizing a bunch of medical jargon is not "intelligence". Many doctors are dumber than a box of hammers when it comes to anything other than medicine.

Should you ever find yourself in need of open heart surgery, you might want to consider keeping your erroneous perceptions to yourself before your doctor holds your life in his hands.

Or maybe you might consider it a DIY project.

Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post

Should you ever find yourself in need of open heart surgery, you might want to consider keeping your erroneous perceptions to yourself before your doctor holds your life in his hands.

Or maybe you might consider it a DIY project.
I think the truth is somewhere in between. Some doctors are brilliant, some are pretty average guys. And there is a lot of "trial and error" in everyday medicine. For example, Thursday I go to the doctor for a follow-up of discovering that I have a gall stone. There is already a jumping to a conclusion that the symptoms I am having is because of the gall stone. I will have to push to get a further consideration that it could be the gall stone and/or other digestive system issues. Been there with other medical issues, done that.

In fact the best example for me was when I started having mild tachycardia 5 years ago. First time I went in -- "Oh, you're just dehydrated". Second time I went in...the same diagnosis. Third time I went in...same diagnosis. Fourth time I insisted on some testing. "Well, Mr. L----, you were right. You do have a heart issue. Too much jumping to conclusions based on what the most frequent diagnosis is. Just a month or so ago there was a study released that indicated that the majority of patients will suffer from at least one significant misdiagnosis in their life time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top