Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2016, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,165,825 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sskink View Post
I get the sense that a lot of y'all would love to be plantation owners with slaves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
and pray tell what would repealing the 17th amendment do to change the fact that slavery is outlawed in this country?
You didn't seriously expect to have an intelligent rational discussion with the Left on this matter, did you?

All they have is knee-jerk nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2016, 08:36 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
Interesting article about the quiet movement among some conservatives to push for repealing the 17th Amendment, which implemented the direct election of US Senators:

The War Against the 17th Amendment

What do you think about this?

I was always happy with the 17th Amendment until Obamacare changed my mind - now I understand why that part of the Constitution was written the way it was. A Senate chosen by state legislatures would never have imposed Obamacare and mandatory Medicaid expansion on the states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2016, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,133,169 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
The Senate is supposed the represent the "will of the state", not the people. The state legislature should send its representatives.
The constitution was amended because it was discovered this was a bad idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 05:46 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
Right! And let's repeal the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 19th Amendments as well since they are all "corruptions" of the Constitution.

Get a clue. The amendment process was specifically included in the US Constitution in order to "corrupt" it by adapting to changing situations and attitudes.
Oh, please!

You're obviously a believer in the "living Constitution" myth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,214,152 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
Interesting article about the quiet movement among some conservatives to push for repealing the 17th Amendment, which implemented the direct election of US Senators:

The War Against the 17th Amendment

What do you think about this?
The GOP cannot win many statewide elections during pres. cycle. They want power for their party owners not the people of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 06:08 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,472,102 times
Reputation: 9435
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
I say abolish the Senate altogether, or at least greatly reduce its power.


In the U.K., the House of Commons (Lower House) has most of the power and the House of Lords (Upper House) barely has any. Actually, most democracies around the world follow this model.


Our Senate is a fairly ridiculous, and, by design, undemocratic chamber.
I say that`s a good idea. As it is, a handful of cowboy states with small numbers of voters carry too much clout. Prairie dogs and rattlesnakes don`t need this much representation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,200,983 times
Reputation: 13779
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
try again. the 17th amendment IS a corruption of the constitution, try reading sometime. the founders set up the house as the representatives of the people, and the senate as the representatives of the state. and they had good reason to do that. it prevents what has happened over the decades since the 17th amendment was passed and ratified, and that is the power of the states has been severely reduced and given over to the federal government.

we need to reverse that and take power away from the feds and give it back to the states.
I have read it. Nowhere in the US Constitution is the structure of the federal government as originally outlined in the US Constitution exempted from amendment.

Go ahead ... you and your states-rights ideologues find some dumbarsed Pubbie with a political death wish to introduce your proposed amendment in Congress. See how far it gets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 06:16 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,200,983 times
Reputation: 13779
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Oh, please!

You're obviously a believer in the "living Constitution" myth.
It's not a myth. This isn't 1789.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 10:45 AM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,286,813 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Oh, please!

You're obviously a believer in the "living Constitution" myth.
Can Amendments be added to the Constitution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 12:44 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,064,273 times
Reputation: 3884
Agree 100%.

The 17th dealt a big blow to the concept of what a Federal Republic was intended to do. Divide the power among the federal government and the individual state governments. It was the compromise necessary to move from a disunited and weaker confederation style of government to a stronger Federal Republic. Without representation for the states, we have moved toward a more pure form of democracy. Democracies can never be healthy long term and always devolve toward mobocratic rule.

The pitch to get the 17th passed was corruption, corruption, corruption and gridlock.

See how we stamped those out with the 17th?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
I'm all for it.

The US is federal republic with an equilateral power-sharing system between the States, the People, and the federal government.

The 17th Amendment diminishes the power of the States.

The States should be free to amend their constitutions to select federal Senators any way they want.



Indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top