Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-23-2016, 10:33 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,385,439 times
Reputation: 768

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Maybe you need to read it again more carefully.
Or maybe you should. The freshened water doesn't get cool enough to sink and that shuts down the gulf stream. It limits heat transfer to the higher latitudes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2016, 10:43 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,445,026 times
Reputation: 6960
I'm good. I'm 100FT. + above sea level
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 10:49 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
I'm good. I'm 100FT. + above sea level
Well...................... by the AGW cult estimates, the flooding "boogyman" is going to get you also.

If you are at 1,000 ft, you are at 12,000 inches.

12,000/2.4= 5,000

So, according to the AGW cult, ALL of the midwest will be an inland sea in 5,000 years.

The math of the ridiculous. Miama under water in 10 years and most of the eastern seaboard (Boston, NYC) under water in 45 years.

Isn't it funny that the cult members really don't stop and think how absurd this really is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 10:51 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,385,439 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
He said 9 ft.
Quote:
Davidson said recent data that has been collected but has yet to be made official indicates sea levels could rise by roughly 3 meters or 9 feet by 2050-2060, far higher and quicker than current projections. Until now most projections have warned of seal level rise of up to 4 feet by 2100.
3 meters, or nine feet. 3 meters is closer to ten feet, but if you round down not up you get 9 feet. nine feet ten inches to be more exact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post

12 inches = 1 foot

9 X 12= 108 inches

It is 2016. In 45 years, we will be at 2061. That is the upper limit of when we are all going to drown, according to the "estimate" (so I am "spotting them" several years).

108/45= 2.4 inches per year. Thanks for the "math lesson".

Of course, a 2.4 inch per year rise in sea level is completely outrageous and absurd for anyone except those in the AGW cult, who are easily fooled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezcgPAptbIk


This one shows ice flowing in water at a speed measured in miles per hour.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ice_Shelf




Jakobshavn is moving at 40 meters a day. 800Km * 1Kn * 0.04Km = 32 cubic Km per day. that would get you about 1/10th of a foot per year for the loss of the ross ice shelf and having it flow at the rate that Jacobshavn is flowing currently. (About 15 years after it lost its tongue) That sea level rise is very reasonable if you do the math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 10:54 AM
 
2,652 posts, read 8,582,247 times
Reputation: 1915
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
Just wait for the anti climate science deniers to come in.
They've been making incorrect sea level change predictions for many years. Excuse me for being a little skeptical on their current predictions.

Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 11:04 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 19,620,154 times
Reputation: 4544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You indicated doubt on sea level rise, it is already occurring in Miami.
I don't doubt sea level is rising. Did you not see the published paper that I cited? I doubt that it will all of the sudden jump from 3mm+/- per year to 10 feet in 45 years.


Quote:
Adapting is easy when you have a thousand years but when you have a hundred years and dense populations near the coast line it is far from simple.
And what do you propose to do about this even if that was the case?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 11:04 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113

AGU 2015: Eric Rignot - Ice Sheet Systems and Sea Level Change (Sea level rise)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 11:07 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Or maybe you should. The freshened water doesn't get cool enough to sink and that shuts down the gulf stream. It limits heat transfer to the higher latitudes.
I've read quite a lot of papers and watched quite a few lectures on abrupt climate change.
Even your own link is not referring to 'global' cooling or a 'coming ice age' as you have claimed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 11:10 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,384,541 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Not one bit. Too much lag in the environment. Too much thermal inertia. We are past the tipping point.


So the correct action is now full speed ahead on adding CO2 to raise the global temps even more to stave off the coming ice age.
Your second sentence is a ridiculous and illogical statement not supported by science. There is no 'coming ice age'.

Last edited by Ceist; 05-23-2016 at 11:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2016, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Inland Northwest
596 posts, read 428,626 times
Reputation: 821
I'm all in. Absolutely all in. What do we do about coastal real estate prices? I mean, this is dire we need to do something now? How are the real estate prices (particularly here in the US) reacting to this danger?


Does this rise benefit any flora and fauna in the world?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top