Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:21 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,722,558 times
Reputation: 14745

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
No, they are an illustration of trickle down economics. All of those companies essentially started up in garages, and as they grew and prospered, they hired thousands of people with most having good paychecks. They purchased and used services of other companies creating more jobs outside of the primary companies. The taxes paid by those companies and employees paid for infrastructure and social programs that benefitted a large segment of society.
Considering our social programs are going bankrupt and our infrastructure is falling apart, it seems clear that "trickle down" is a failed policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:23 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,976 posts, read 44,788,307 times
Reputation: 13682
What needs to be looked at are the unfunded entitlements. Seniors have paid into SS and Medicare for decades, and there are STILL premiums that have to be paid for Medicare after age 65, so that's not really the problem.

Welfare recipients: Medicaid, CHIP, WIC, food stamps, free school breakfast, lunch, and sometimes even dinner, section 8 housing, welfare, etc., etc. have NO contribution requirements for eligibility.

The UNFUNDED entitlement programs are the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:25 AM
 
26,477 posts, read 15,057,355 times
Reputation: 14622
Technically the last realized surplus we had was under Eisenhower when the national debt decreased during a Fiscal Year. Why does Clinton get credit for saying he OPPOSED balancing the budget, when the push was made by the contract with America for the nearly balanced actual budgets.

As for Trickle Down economics, Obama has seen more of it on his watch than any president with his Fed picks for QE.

All three candidates have proposals to add MORE debt than if no laws were changed. We are screwed, no one us taking the debt seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,510,947 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
All three candidates have proposals to add MORE debt than if no laws were changed. We are screwed, no one us taking the debt seriously.
If you watch the interview, thats basically what Greenspan said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:28 AM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,737,703 times
Reputation: 1721
Alan Greenspan has as much credibility leftover as most anonymous internet posters. 0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,510,947 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
Alan Greenspan has as much credibility leftover as most anonymous internet posters. 0
so you think Trump's plans make any sense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,737,785 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewGuy2016 View Post
A friend and I had a conversation over a year ago, about how our government (all governments really) suck at real long term planning. They plan in vacuums and consider 5-10 years from now to be a long term plan. I also think they suck at analyzing the potential 2nd and 3rd order effects of plans that they implement or fail to implement. Long term planning ideally should be a generation's length, or at least 1/2 of an average generation span. But when you can't even agree year to year on simple budgets...i suppose what can you expect when it comes to real long term planning.
I agree that five to ten years isn't long term planning - unless you compare it to business planning.

And the basic problem is that the world doesn't cooperate. As much as we all like to think we can pronounce "be it so" - we can't.

Another problem is that no Congress can bind a following one. A Congress or President can set a policy, and Congress can enact a law, but that only lasts as long as subsequent Presidents and Congresses agree. In fact, it seems to me that most of the time, both presidents and congress critters run on overturning policies and laws they don't like. Kind of unrewarding to develop a true long-range plan and then go to the work of implementing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:32 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,722,558 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
What needs to be looked at are the unfunded entitlements. Seniors have paid into SS and Medicare for decades, and there are STILL premiums that have to be paid for Medicare after age 65, so that's not really the problem.

Welfare recipients: Medicaid, CHIP, WIC, food stamps, free school breakfast, lunch, and sometimes even dinner, section 8 housing, welfare, etc., etc. have NO contribution requirements for eligibility.

The UNFUNDED entitlement programs are the problem.
Medicare is an unfunded entitlement, just like food stamps, section 8, and welfare, even when accounting for premiums and past payroll taxes. The program borrows billions of dollars from the general fund every year, with no ability to pay it back.

Social Security is one of the few, if only, entitlement programs that was properly funded by the people who use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:40 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,976 posts, read 44,788,307 times
Reputation: 13682
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Medicare is an unfunded entitlement, just like food stamps, section 8, and welfare, even when accounting for premiums and past payroll taxes. The program borrows billions of dollars from the general fund every year, with no ability to pay it back.
Nope. Workers pay FICA for decades before Medicare eligibility. And even then, have to pay Medicare premiums for coverage which are deducted from their SS checks.

Tell me, what are Medicaid, CHIP, WIC, food stamps, free school breakfast, lunch, and sometimes even dinner, section 8 housing, welfare, etc., etc. recipients required to pay into the system before they become eligible for benefits? And how old do they have to be to even apply? 65+? Absolutely NOT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2016, 07:43 AM
 
1,100 posts, read 633,457 times
Reputation: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
I agree that five to ten years isn't long term planning - unless you compare it to business planning.

And the basic problem is that the world doesn't cooperate. As much as we all like to think we can pronounce "be it so" - we can't.

Another problem is that no Congress can bind a following one. A Congress or President can set a policy, and Congress can enact a law, but that only lasts as long as subsequent Presidents and Congresses agree. In fact, it seems to me that most of the time, both presidents and congress critters run on overturning policies and laws they don't like. Kind of unrewarding to develop a true long-range plan and then go to the work of implementing it.
That's part of the issue we discussed as well. A true long term plan (in the sense of my previous post) would truly have to be "fluid" or as the newer buzz phrase...a living document. It would have to be able to be changed, as culture/technology advances and changes. But again, you're right - government is always the problem, as it's made up of politicians and they're never like minded as a whole...which leads to the "my idea is better than yours" and next thing you know...a plan that has been put into place has been rescinded and a new one is ratified.

Sigh - can we just wipe out the human race and start over?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top