Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rarity of crime? How do you account for the U of Toronto case in which males were videoing female students in the showers? How do you account for the male sexual predator proclaiming to be "transgender" to have easy access to his female victims in women's shelters? Why can't you just admit that you're a misogynist?
Why don't you care about the opinion of the nation’s leading organizations dedicated to stopping violence against women, who signed a letter saying that this argument is a myth?
Why can't you just admit that you're a misogynist?
What is this obsession with getting this label established? Name-calling changes nothing. It's a distraction.
"You are a misogynist." "No, I'm not." "Yes, you are." "Am not." "Are too."
Heck, if you read enough online, just about anything a man says that disagrees with a woman makes him a misogynist in the eyes of one woman or another.
I'm saying that such labeling is diversionary, off-topic, unnecessarily divisive, thus ultimately unproductive. This needs to be recognized.
Rarity of crime? How do you account for the U of Toronto case in which males were videoing female students in the showers? How do you account for the male sexual predator proclaiming to be "transgender" to have easy access to his female victims in women's shelters? Why can't you just admit that you're a misogynist?
Just curious. Are you one of those guys who blames a rape victim for being dressed provocatively and having too much to drink?
Regardless of whether I'm a misogynist, you are barking up the wrong tree.
Hey... just give us the number of ADDITIONAL female sexual victimization you'll allow before you recognize that letting "self-proclaimed" "transgenders" into girls'/women's facilities just on their "say so" is too much risk?
What's the number of additional female victims you'll allow? 1? 100? 1,000? 1,000,000?
Why don't you care about the opinion of the nation’s leading organizations dedicated to stopping violence against women, who signed a letter saying that this argument is a myth?
It's true that actual transgenders aren't a threat.
But... What's the definitive definition for passing as a "transgender" to have access to girls'/women's facilities?
So far, it seems to be only one's "say so" no wigs and/or dresses needed.
That opens the door FAR and WIDE for sexual predators. What steps are taken to prevent sexual predators from "claiming" to be "transgender" so they can have easier access to victims? Who stands guard at the entrances to ALL facilities to make sure only legitimate transgenders attempt access?
It's true that actual transgenders aren't a threat.
But... What's the definitive definition for passing as a "transgender" to have access to girls'/women's facilities?
So far, it seems to be only one's "say so" no wigs and/or dresses needed.
That opens the door FAR and WIDE for sexual predators. What steps are taken to prevent sexual predators from "claiming" to be "transgender" so they can have easier access to victims? Who stands guard at the entrances to ALL facilities to make sure only legitimate transgenders attempt access?
Can any of you answer that?
Who stands guard at facilities in North Carolina to enforce H.B. 2?
Hey... just give us the number of ADDITIONAL female sexual victimization you'll allow before you recognize that letting "self-proclaimed" "transgenders" into girls'/women's facilities just on their "say so" is too much risk?
It's a risk I can live with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.