Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-03-2016, 03:36 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,739,460 times
Reputation: 1721

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
That human activities emit CO2, no, that is not up for debate, we also exhale huge amounts of CO2 too.

Humans are responsible for about 3% of that 0.04%, in the atmosphere. The natural production of CO2 by plants, animals and bodies of water and geological functions on planet earth make up the other 97% of CO2.


CO2 is a minor trace gas. Water vapor and methane are much stronger greenhouse gases than CO2.

Have you seen the climate record? The planet just came out of a little ice-age, of course it warmed up, otherwise we'd still be in the LIA. Would you prefer that we had never warmed up, and remained in a cool period?

BTW, we are living in a cool period, by comparison to the last 10,000 year averages.





You know what else came online about the same time as the industrial revolution? Radio frequency radio and TV? We have so much RF in the air now, from radio, TV, cell phone towers, satellites, WiFi... so maybe all that RF is cooking the molecules in our atmosphere.

There, that's my new theory, so ban cell phones, TV and radio.
Snarky new theory. I like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2016, 04:49 PM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13086
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
There aren't "scientists" who disagree with AGW.
Many of them do, but anyone who disagrees is called a crackpot and they lose their grant money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:37 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,739,460 times
Reputation: 1721
So comical. I post actual California house bill, not to affirm 'conspiracy theorists' but to show phrasing, and nary a peep. That almost, I still won't assign labels, tips me to the 'Eco-religion' side do to crickets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:42 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samiamnh View Post
Plan and simple....the man made global warming hoax is a plan to introduce a world wide carbon tax.....more money for governments to redistribute.
That's actually only one small piece of it. The real goals are much more pervasive. And this video comes from a liberal Democrat:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipKHqY7uxSg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:48 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,118,333 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
That human activities emit CO2, no, that is not up for debate, we also exhale huge amounts of CO2 too.

Humans are responsible for about 3% of that 0.04%, in the atmosphere. The natural production of CO2 by plants, animals and bodies of water and geological functions on planet earth make up the other 97% of CO2.
Ok? And that % keeps increasing and the rate of increase is increasing. If you think that 0.04% is insignificant than ingest 0.04% of your body mass with arsenic or cyanide.

Quote:
CO2 is a minor trace gas. Water vapor and methane are much stronger greenhouse gases than CO2.
And we have been emitting a lot of methane through our agricultural system to feed an ever growing population.

Quote:
Have you seen the climate record? The planet just came out of a little ice-age, of course it warmed up, otherwise we'd still be in the LIA. Would you prefer that we had never warmed up, and remained in a cool period?

BTW, we are living in a cool period, by comparison to the last 10,000 year averages.
Mankind's actions are simply exacerbating natural climate mechanisms.


Quote:
You know what else came online about the same time as the industrial revolution? Radio frequency radio and TV? We have so much RF in the air now, from radio, TV, cell phone towers, satellites, WiFi... so maybe all that RF is cooking the molecules in our atmosphere.

There, that's my new theory, so ban cell phones, TV and radio.
That's silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:51 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
These discussions almost never include the fact that we've had technology to manipulate the weather/climate since the early 1950s:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lR5ChXpQOY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:54 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,739,460 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Ok? And that % keeps increasing and the rate of increase is increasing. If you think that 0.04% is insignificant than ingest 0.04% of your body mass with arsenic or cyanide.



And we have been emitting a lot of methane through our agricultural system to feed an ever growing population.



Mankind's actions are simply exacerbating natural climate mechanisms.




That's silly.
Fallacious anology comparing co2 to cyanide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 05:58 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,519,803 times
Reputation: 10096
We exhale CO2. It is not a pollutant. In fact life on this planet is critically dependent on it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 06:01 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,739,460 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
We exhale CO2. It is not a pollutant. In fact life on this planet is critically dependent on it
Every member of kingdom animalia does.

There is a balance and we are introducing more than the normal system would. But the claims on the other side boil down to this: science. Not applied, just stated. Or, as in preschool, nanny nanny, boo boo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2016, 06:04 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,739,460 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
We exhale CO2. It is not a pollutant. In fact life on this planet is critically dependent on it
Btw, some in the e.u. Want to categorize co2 as a pollutant. Not sure you saw, but ca offered this an 1161. Read that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top