Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, you did not. What's the number? Give us a number.
98-99% of sex predators are MALE. How many more additional MINOR girl victims of sex predators exploiting this "policy" will it take for you all to back off?!? How many MORE girls have to suffer? How many is enough?
1? 10? 100? 1,000?...
How many more girls have to be victimized before this BS is stopped?
Remember, we're talking about EVERY public school in the country. They ALL have to force MINOR girls to submit to additional risk of sexual victimization, or lose their federal funding.
No, you did not. What's the number? Give us a number.
98-99% of sex predators are MALE. How many more additional MINOR girl victims of sex predators exploiting this "policy" will it take for you all to back off?!? How many MORE girls have to suffer? How many is enough?
1? 10? 100? 1,000?...
How many more girls have to be victimized before this BS is stopped?
Remember, we're talking about EVERY public school in the country. They ALL have to force MINOR girls to submit to additional risk of sexual victimization, or lose their federal funding.
So... What's the number?
Well honestly None. There will be none subscribe-able to the letter. None. That is because the letter changed nothing. So nothing can be its fault.
No, you did not. What's the number? Give us a number.
98-99% of sex predators are MALE. How many more additional MINOR girl victims of sex predators exploiting this "policy" will it take for you all to back off?!? How many MORE girls have to suffer? How many is enough?
1? 10? 100? 1,000?...
How many more girls have to be victimized before this BS is stopped?
Remember, we're talking about EVERY public school in the country. They ALL have to force MINOR girls to submit to additional risk of sexual victimization, or lose their federal funding.
So... What's the number?
732, does that sound like a good number because you didn't accept zero when I said that one?
But then again I don't live in a fantasy and am capable to realize that teenage boys aren't going to flood girls facilities pretending to be girls like some Porky's movie, nor are girls just gonna start getting naked in front of guys claiming to be girls.
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,908,746 times
Reputation: 16451
Oh thank ghod. I am so glad to see this 35 page thread back up at the top, because with everything else going on, there are STILL trans people going potty. OMG!
This is how I feel. If you're born a woman, you're a woman, no its, ands or buts about it. If you're born a man, you're a man. Period. I find trying to change one's gender quite deviant.
You cant tell people how they are born,the maybe born with male or female sex organs but mentality and physically they are feel they are the opposite sex.Let people live their lifes
No, you did not. What's the number? Give us a number.
98-99% of sex predators are MALE. How many more additional MINOR girl victims of sex predators exploiting this "policy" will it take for you all to back off?!? How many MORE girls have to suffer? How many is enough?
1? 10? 100? 1,000?...
How many more girls have to be victimized before this BS is stopped?
Remember, we're talking about EVERY public school in the country. They ALL have to force MINOR girls to submit to additional risk of sexual victimization, or lose their federal funding.
That's not the issue. The issue is "claiming" to be transgender with no proof whatsoever required. It's based solely on "say so."
We all know what happens when a student has to miss school for 2 weeks for an illness: a doctor's note is required. But a student can "claim" to be transgender and have full access and use of school multiple occupancy restrooms/changing/locker/shower rooms (in which MINOR students are partially unclothed or naked) that are the opposite of their physical anatomy for 180+ days of the school year, no doctor's note or any other proof required.
Understand the difference?
The Transgender Cause SJWs are going WAY too far on this, and there WILL be backlash. It will negatively affect the entire LGBT community, as people will not be so quick to sympathize with their cause when their own and/or their school-age child's right to privacy is violated by government FORCE.
Just look at the response of those old enough to have kids... 77%of the age 30+ population doesn't want transgenders to be able to "choose" which facilities (men's/boys' or women's/girls') to use in school.
Their used to be a time when blacks couldnt use the same bathroom as whites due to a "phobia"/racism,I hope we arent stuck in a phobia mindset denying a certain group the same privilege as the next correct?
Good! So, the first time a sex crime is committed against a girl by a male "self-identifying" as transgender so allowed full access to a school (ANY public school in the country) girls' restroom/changing/locker/shower room (in which MINOR girls are in partial stages of undress or naked), the Obama Admin will agree to rescind this edict?
You and all the other Transgender Cause SJW's will demand the rescission, no?
Good to hear!
Quote:
That is because the letter changed nothing.
It changed everything. Anatomical males were not previously allowed to use girls' multiple occupancy restooms/changing/locker/shower rooms in which MINOR girls were partially unclothed or naked.
Now they have full access to such girls based ONLY on their "say so." No proof whatsoever required. And if you think additional sex crimes won't result from this, you're SADLY mistaken. They already occur in the general public.
When you read about these additional crimes (and they WILL happen), remember that YOU'RE the one who wanted them to happen. YOU'RE the one who INSISTED that MINOR girls unwilling submit themselves to an increased risk of sex crime victimization.
732, does that sound like a good number because you didn't accept zero when I said that one?
If your answer was "zero," then you couldn't possibly support this edict. It WILL result in additional sex crimes committed against MINOR girl students.
How do we know? 98-99% of all sex predators are MALE. Some of those already pretend to be transgender to get easier access to their female victims in public facilities.
And I'll say the same thing to YOU... When you read about these additional crimes (and they WILL happen), remember that YOU'RE the one who wanted them to happen. YOU'RE the one who INSISTED that MINOR girls unwilling submit themselves to an increased risk of sex crime victimization.
You cant tell people how they are born,the maybe born with male or female sex organs but mentality and physically they are feel they are the opposite sex.Let people live their lifes
Why can't that also be true for cisgender school girls? 51% of America's student population is cisgender female. Only 0.3% are "supposedly" transgender (there's actually no legitimate identification criteria - it's merely based on how someone "feels" at that particular moment). Why are 51% forced to risk their safety to appease 0.3%?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
