Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
By not letting them come near you or get with in striking distance? Duh!!!!
Why did none of our parents or grandparents get killed by a Nazi or Japanese soldier in the lower 48 states during WWII? Or by a German or Italian soldier during WWI?
...
White people have a human right to their own societies. As do Asians, Indians and Africans. Everyone has their own culture and continent and everyone needs to be where they belong. And non-Western peoples do not belong in Western Societies and vice versa.
Multiculturalism is un-natural, it does not make a society stronger, it weakens and splinters it and the only reason it exist is because the elites want to destroy Western Civilization and bring about the demise of the Caucasian Race and the countries they call home.
Yah, well, there were a few deaths & some damage in the Pacific NW US - caused by fire/explosive balloons launched by Japan. The casualties were few, but dead is dead - the campaign was mentioned here before, in this forum, as I recall. & just offshore (the Gulf & East coast), before (& after, too, I think) the US entered WWII, German Navy submarines ran amok & sank lots of US shipping - not technically, in the lower US 48. I suppose it still counts, as those were coastal waters, & therefore enemy action in territorial waters. Those losses in life & materiel & ships were large, TMK.
Yah, you can argue that the various races have their continents, & should stay there.
1. Then what are Caucasians doing in Africa, New World, Asia? That's assuming that the rules apply equally all around. Or are you arguing for something else?
2. Multiculturalism - that ship sailed a long time ago - @ the Age of Discovery (see #1 above). Once UK & Commonwealth, & US & Europe in general, etc. went through the Industrial Revolution, then POL comes from overseas, once domestic supplies are exhausted or uneconomic. Credit & money pursue the lowest-cost labor - or you have to distort patterns of trade to have it otherwise. The Europeans worked the Native Peoples in the New World to death, or they died of European disease, & then imported Black slaves to replace the Native Peoples. If you don't like the neighbors, you could have stayed home - in the place where you belong (Sounds like the TV sitcom Cheers to me).
3. TMK, no one is calling for the demise of the Caucasians - their importance & dominance in World affairs is winding down, & will likely continue to do so. The Spanish, Portuguese, French, Belgian & Italian empires came apart. The Ottoman Empire declined. The Russian/Soviet empire fell. Even the British Empire barely got past WWII, & I believe the UK went bankrupt in 1944 or so.
Caucasian fortunes on average will continue to fall, unless the Western countries manage to reinvigorate themselves. Throwing tantrums won't do it.
whether they be drugged out psychopaths, or just your run of the mill jihadi - they're willing to die for their cause. How do you fight this mentality?
Someone earlier suggested we adopt destroying their families' home like Israel does. I don't think that would make a difference. Especially if they're estranged from their families.
We - the West - could fight this battle. In the US, it would take a Presidential Finding, I think they're called - declaring the Wahhabis (for instance) in Saudi Arabia, their sources of funding, their network of Madrassas & staffing for same Worldwide, to be imminent dangers to the US. Then the intelligence communities of the US could be tasked with identifying & attacking the Wahhabis @ root, until we'd destroyed enough of the structure to render them ineffective. Then we could turn to the next group, & the next group, & so on.
Thus far, we've taken the other tack - attacking networks or cells of shooters or attackers once they begin to move to attack targets in the West. This is very difficult to do, & requires a very high degree of coordination among the targeted countries & communities.
Targeting the ideological sources & bases of the shooters is much easier - they have fixed addresses & have to communicate with their followers, transact business, & so on. It's much easier to find & fix noncombatant actors than shooters trained to stay in hiding until the time to attack.
The real problem with this scenario is that the Jihadists aren't an existential threat to the West in general, nor to the US. They can posture for the cameras & set off bombs & shoot people here & there, but as far as toppling governments (Afghanistan's experience with the USSR notwithstanding), it's an entirely different level of operations. The USSR was simply tottering on the grave's edge to begin with, it only took a small impulse to push them over the brink.
I don't see this happening anytime soon, but this is one possibility if we in the West ever decide to put a quasi-military end to the issue. It's not clear to me that this would work - the big brains & regional/cultural/religious experts in the Organs need to work that out. If it's doable, it'll likely go on the back burner - something to be dusted off & exercised if we ever get serious about the Islamic threat.
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,728,425 times
Reputation: 20050
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman
After they have been killed, bury them on a hog farm. That would remove the incentive to become a "martyr".
yep, they should have wrapped Bin laden's body with bacon and blasted it out to space and carried the footage live on every major TV station around the world..
yep, they should have wrapped Bin laden's body with bacon and blasted it out to space and carried the footage live on every major TV station around the world..
whether they be drugged out psychopaths, or just your run of the mill jihadi - they're willing to die for their cause. How do you fight this mentality?
Someone earlier suggested we adopt destroying their families' home like Israel does. I don't think that would make a difference. Especially if they're estranged from their families.
If one looks at the incidents in Israel that actually end up with a death of a Israeli and adjusts for population, the US would have a 40:1 ratio. The US has a death penalty while Israel does not. The US has such a red taped Judicial system nearly anything held would be transferred or sold off before a case ever made it into court. The US would need to change its seizure laws from take and sell to take and destroy.
The government needs to invest in a small hog farm. Every time one of these Islamic butchers pulls a terrorist act, if they are alive, strip them, bind their hands and feet and throw them in with the hogs. Hogs will eat a human being in a short time, only thing you'll later find is teeth. Alive or dead, same solution. Make sure it's televised live on Al Jazeera.
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,948,076 times
Reputation: 16466
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310
Just kill them.
Exactly.
My God! Something we agree on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An eye for an eye
