Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2016, 07:59 AM
 
29,486 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14449

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Fabulous news. Nice to see Mass have some real courage and to see a state standing up to the NRA.

Hopefully many more states will follow, and the U.S. will be a place governed by the people, not by the NRA loons.

Nice rant. What does it accomplish though ? Just curious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2016, 07:59 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,559 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17595
To compound the problem, Mass stands in the way of a hunting trip to Maine.


So now hunters who drive thru Mass with semi auto rifles on the way to Maine will be impacted??? Don't be surprised if Mass requires those hunters to call ahead and let st police know they are driving thru...just as the law already on the books for pistols.


Driving to Maine with a pistol thru Mass requires you to contact Mass police to let them know you will be driving thru their state.


How many that hunt in Maine, NH, VT call Mass to tell them you have a pistol in your vehicle if you drive thru Mass?


Imagine a guy going to hunt in Manie fron NJ, has a pistol in his car and didn;t call ahead to Mass st police....the law is quite happy to send an otherwise law abiding citizen to prison to share a cell with a gangbanger. That is a bad law. Punish those who violate administrative gun laws and exempt gang members running and selling drugs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:06 AM
 
29,486 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14449
Quote:
Originally Posted by numberfive View Post
I guess it's easier to blame the NRA instead of poverty, drugs, gangs, or mental health.

I'm not an NRA member and I want to reduce gun violence. Even if I waved a magic wand and made the NRA disappear, I'm not foolish enough to think it would help fix mental health, gang problems, etc.

You are preaching to the choir, people like this will just never get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:07 AM
 
211 posts, read 113,977 times
Reputation: 236
But remember, they're not trying to take your guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:08 AM
 
29,486 posts, read 14,650,004 times
Reputation: 14449
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
The AG was mad because gun owners were following the law and didn't have guns with the evil features they thought were so dangerious that they made illegal, things like having a stock that is adjustable to better fit the user is too dangerious so people pinned the stock to one length, etc.


This is highly unconstitutional, not just one 2nd amendment grounds, but having the state executive branch create law out of whole cloth by decree should scare anyone.

I would think but can she get away with it because the law was existing , but now the "interpretation" of it is different ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:09 AM
 
1,448 posts, read 1,187,699 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Criminals, by definition, don't "give a flip" about whatever law is being broken. That doesn't mean we shouldn't have laws. A murderer doesn't "give a flip" about homicide laws; doesn't mean we should legalize murder.
But it doesn't mean that passing another law that bans murder will solve the murder problem, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:10 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,288 posts, read 47,043,365 times
Reputation: 34073
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyogaH View Post
But remember, they're not trying to take your guns.
They won't be honest about it. If they leave you a single shot rifle then they will crow they aren't trying to take your guns.

Fools don't even know how a ban works.

I can't wait to see their jaws drop when they see the non-compliance numbers and lack of enforcement.


Most people that own what they are after don't even know this whole mess is going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:11 AM
 
1,448 posts, read 1,187,699 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
So your argument is that we should make it easier for terrorists to acquire guns in Europe?
No, my argument is that banning rifles that look "scary" will do nothing to help our nation's gun crime problem, but they will make millions of Americans felons for possessing a firearm that was previously legal and no more dangerous than any other firearm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:11 AM
 
Location: zooland 1
3,744 posts, read 4,087,312 times
Reputation: 5531
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Fabulous news. Nice to see Mass have some real courage and to see a state standing up to the NRA.

Hopefully many more states will follow, and the U.S. will be a place governed by the people, not by the NRA loons.

This is the goofball left who thinks that gun control doesn't equate to the disintegration of our Constitution... And that anything could be on tbe table... And as we have seen by Obama...all aspects of your life can be subject to government intervention....
Perhaps you'll like living in grey concrete public housing...maybe you already do...

Not me..and not anyone who can critically think about what is going on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2016, 08:12 AM
 
1,448 posts, read 1,187,699 times
Reputation: 1268
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Then you would imagine wrong. Truck licenses are expensive, trucks are very expensive, and the truck operator licenses definitely require background trucks.
Nope. I can walk into Ryder today and rent a large truck for maybe a hundred bucks with no special driver license and no background check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top