Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it's one thing to illegally make a choice to be a pathetic druggie, but another to have it forced on you like this, yes, Domestic Terrorism.....
If you would care to brush up on your science, then I will have a discussion about it with you. But short of that, you will have to discuss it with another Reefer Madness junkie, like the OP.
If you are calling me a pathetic druggie, I will put my life's accomplishments up against yours any day of the week.
If you would care to brush up on your science, then I will have a discussion about it with you. But short of that, you will have to discuss it with another Reefer Madness junkie, like the OP.
If you are calling me a pathetic druggie, I will put my life's accomplishments up against yours any day of the week.
Who has called you a pathetic druggie except yourself?... Stop whining victimology...you're a self professed functional user. Iirc you self identified..or identified others as having a psychological addiction to mj use.
Tell us again..
Your life accomplishments?
Mine relate directly to stopping the flow of drugs into my communities and improving the quality of life for all
You?
Mj folks go out of their way to prove themselves to non drug users
All drugs will reduce self respect...mj isn't any different
Inconvenient truths like the rocky mountain high report demonstrate this.
Another couldn't resist
Now..as to terminology... Junkie... Generally a term for someone addicted to opiod street drugs
Refer madness was a historical term... Get with the times
Drug warrior is more contemporary
What terrorism will mj find today worldwide...substantial would be my opinion
What environmental damage is being done today for mj?... substantial would be my opinion...
Time to hit the weights instead of just a hit...
Last edited by notmeofficer; 08-01-2016 at 06:22 AM..
If you would care to brush up on your science, then I will have a discussion about it with you. But short of that, you will have to discuss it with another Reefer Madness junkie, like the OP.
If you are calling me a pathetic druggie, I will put my life's accomplishments up against yours any day of the week.
quit honestly, I don't care what your accomplishments are, that is not the topic of this discussion....
and as far as calling you a pathetic druggie, did I mention your name at all?
Guess if the shoe fits?
In reading your posts, it seems you have no respect for anyone else, hence, not even yourself....so?
and as far as calling you a pathetic druggie, did I mention your name at all?
The inference was obvious, as it is in your next line:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee
Guess if the shoe fits?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cremebrulee
In reading your posts, it seems you have no respect for anyone else, hence, not even yourself....so?
Since most of my posts are directed at very misinformed, myopic prohibitionists, I can see how you could be left with that impression. The real me has plenty of respect for plenty of folks, including myself. But I am not the problem. It is those who wish to prolong an extremely damaging and wasteful drug war, based on their agenda, corruption, and/or brainwashing that are the problem.
Btw..the software program I was working on was used..
Along with a drone... Then a chp helicopter
Then a Blackhawk with the local marijuana eradication team...
Btw..the software program I was working on was used..
Along with a drone... Then a chp helicopter
Then a Blackhawk with the local marijuana eradication team...
Good job !!!!
I agree! Good job!!!
Those are exactly the type grows that we don't need and will go away once cannabis is legalized and regulated.
However, as per usual, you cannot count on the accuracy of these reports. For example, it reports that 4 to 6 gallons of water per per plant per day would be needed for the plants to thrive. How ridiculous! Very, very typical of law enforcement -- exaggerate everything by at least 5 to 10 times.
So that makes me automatically question whether it really was 36,000 plants, and whether they really belonged to a Mexican drug trafficking organization, and just about every other fact in the report.
LEOs never seem to learn that when they exaggerate and stretch the truth to the breaking point it all it does is bring everything they say or report into scrutiny. The comments after the article are already starting to reflect this.
Those are exactly the type grows that we don't need and will go away once cannabis is legalized and regulated.
However, as per usual, you cannot count on the accuracy of these reports. For example, it reports that 4 to 6 gallons of water per per plant per day would be needed for the plants to thrive. How ridiculous! Very, very typical of law enforcement -- exaggerate everything by at least 5 to 10 times.
So that makes me automatically question whether it really was 36,000 plants, and whether they really belonged to a Mexican drug trafficking organization, and just about every other fact in the report.
LEOs never seem to learn that when they exaggerate and stretch the truth to the breaking point it all it does is bring everything they say or report into scrutiny. The comments after the article are already starting to reflect this.
Not to mention the taxpayer dollars saved by not having to send out the manpower and helicopters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
did I mention your name at all? 
