Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

We hear it all the time. They say "why are you opposed to our government having access to our private information? I have nothing to hide, so it doesn't bother me". But it could. Our government, and the DEA in particular, is obsessed with the drug war. So anything that could possibly be drug related attracts their attention. And even more so if it presents an opportunity for the thieves with badges to steal somebody's money. Clearly, they aren't interested in the drugs. Just the cash.
----------------

WASHINGTON — Federal drug agents regularly mine Americans’ travel information to profile people who might be ferrying money for narcotics traffickers — though they almost never use what they learn to make arrests or build criminal cases.

Instead, that targeting has helped the Drug Enforcement Administration seize a small fortune in cash.

DEA agents have profiled passengers on Amtrak trains and nearly every major U.S. airline, drawing on reports from a network of travel-industry informants that extends from ticket counters to back offices, a USA TODAY investigation has found. Agents assigned to airports and train stations singled out passengers for questioning or searches for reasons as seemingly benign as traveling one-way to California or having paid for a ticket in cash.

The DEA surveillance is separate from the vast and widely-known anti-terrorism apparatus that now surrounds air travel, which is rarely used for routine law enforcement. It has been carried out largely without the airlines’ knowledge.

It is a lucrative endeavor, and one that remains largely unknown outside the drug agency. DEA units assigned to patrol 15 of the nation’s busiest airports seized more than $209 million in cash from at least 5,200 people over the past decade after concluding the money was linked to drug trafficking, according to Justice Department records. Most of the money was passed on to local police departments that lend officers to assist the drug agency.

DEA regularly mines Americans' travel records to seize millions in cash
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:03 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,132 posts, read 19,714,475 times
Reputation: 25649
Drug-induced paranoia. Lay off the pot and you won't have these nightmares.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:07 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,573 posts, read 17,286,360 times
Reputation: 37320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
.......... the DEA in particular, is obsessed with the drug war. ....... Clearly, they aren't interested in the drugs. Just the cash...
The DEA is "obsessed with the drug war". Really? What do you think they should concern themselves with?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
The DEA is "obsessed with the drug war". Really? What do you think they should concern themselves with?!
Nothing at all. The DEA should be disbanded. They are totally out of control and are a cancer on our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,900 posts, read 3,900,192 times
Reputation: 5856
Anyone concerned with big government surveillance shouldn't be voting for either Trump or Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:31 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,937,957 times
Reputation: 6764
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandsthetime View Post
Anyone concerned with big government surveillance shouldn't be voting for either Trump or Clinton.
You do have a point here.......yet, Hillary is already rolling and her plan has been in place for a longtime. Hopefully, Trump dislikes Hillary and her cronies enough to not let her get within miles of the WH or him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,610,392 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandsthetime View Post
Anyone concerned with big government surveillance shouldn't be voting for either Trump or Clinton.
It's too late, the systems are already in place so it doesn't matter who's sitting in the oval office.

Every time anyone uses their credit card, shops online or at a brick and mortar store, travels, surfs the web, emails, sends a text message or makes a call, shares documents - it's all stored away in a big database operated by the NSA. Each of us has a unique fingerprint with all the information gathered, all the people in our social and business circles identified, so no matter where we go, all of our activity is collected.

They do this with people in other countries, as well, only they make the statement they're not spying on anyone because if they've gathered information on everyone, they're not really targeting any one person in particular, so they don't consider it spying.

And not only do we share this with the Five Eyes, we share the XKeyScore with other countries, as well.

We've become the dirty Communist country we grew up loathing back in the '50's and '60's and nobody even cares.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
The State always knows what's best for us. No worries.

(Hopes Uncle Sam took the bait)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:53 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,554,547 times
Reputation: 4471
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandsthetime View Post
Anyone concerned with big government surveillance shouldn't be voting for either Trump or Clinton.
agreed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 01:00 PM
 
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,951,921 times
Reputation: 16466
Most of the federal alphabet agencies need to be disbanded.

Actually the Fed govt needs to be removed and reset with one that "establishes Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,"

Oh hey...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top