Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because liberals are ignorant about world affairs, history & other cultures. They have no clue about whats happening in Europe so they are repeating Germany's mistake by electing our own Angela Merkel. The naive & gullible liberal's utopia wont last too long & the same anti-weapons liberals will wake up to armed soldiers on beaches amid crumbling economy & serious threats they cant ignore. I hope Trump get elected & this never happens but the media has more influence on people than common sense.
Take the number of refugees that have invaded Europe and know that Muslims have the highest reproductive rate of any religion (average 3.1 per woman according to Wikipedia).
Take the number of refugees that already live in this country, add the number that Clinton wants to bring into this country, and know the same thing about their reproductive levels. Then picture this country 20 years from now.
Take the number of refugees that have invaded Europe and know that Muslims have the highest reproductive rate of any religion (average 3.1 per woman according to Wikipedia).
Take the number of refugees that already live in this country, add the number that Clinton wants to bring into this country, and know the same thing about their reproductive levels. Then picture this country 20 years from now.
if we continue at the rate we are... in 25 years there will be a 5% muslims population in the USA. We all know what happens once it reaches 10%.... look at France, they have a 10%
Each year, each admin determines the maximum number of refugees it will accept and from which region.
Congress controls the purse strings and can fund, cut or eliminate funding.
Refugee resettlement peaked in the 80's and the source regions were primarily Asia and Africa.
Current refugee resettlement is a fraction of what it was 30-35 years ago.
I would cease all refugee resettlement from everywhere.
Illegal immigration became a tidal wave in the 80's and peaked in 2005/6 with the housing bubble. It has not mattered who sat the oval or held the majority, over the past 30 years, the illegal immigration can kept on kicking.
" The Wall" strikes me as " do something" legislation no different than gun control. No wall is high enough nor troops deep enough to prevent illegal immigration.
Investing in beefing up E- Verify biometrics make sense. Making e- Verify a federal law makes sense.
Seizing the assets of anyone or any business employing undocumented workers makes sense.
Getting a SCOTUS ruling on birth right citizenship makes sense. If it's Constituional, an amendment makes sense. All it takes is a super majority of Congress and 38 states to ratify it. POTUS has no vote.
Trump is in favor of making it easier to legally employ foreign workers. Why?
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 22 days ago)
27,631 posts, read 16,115,213 times
Reputation: 19027
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom
Each year, each admin determines the maximum number of refugees it will accept and from which region.
Congress controls the purse strings and can fund, cut or eliminate funding.
Refugee resettlement peaked in the 80's and the source regions were primarily Asia and Africa.
Current refugee resettlement is a fraction of what it was 30-35 years ago.
I would cease all refugee resettlement from everywhere.
Illegal immigration became a tidal wave in the 80's and peaked in 2005/6 with the housing bubble. It has not mattered who sat the oval or held the majority, over the past 30 years, the illegal immigration can kept on kicking.
" The Wall" strikes me as " do something" legislation no different than gun control. No wall is high enough nor troops deep enough to prevent illegal immigration.
Investing in beefing up E- Verify biometrics make sense. Making e- Verify a federal law makes sense.
Seizing the assets of anyone or any business employing undocumented workers makes sense.
Getting a SCOTUS ruling on birth right citizenship makes sense. If it's Constituional, an amendment makes sense. All it takes is a super majority of Congress and 38 states to ratify it. POTUS has no vote.
Trump is in favor of making it easier to legally employ foreign workers. Why?
Border patrol favors Trump. Hilliary wants to up the number of refugees along with amnesty. Trump has this position on H1b visas Donald Trump's proposal on H-1B visas is bad news for Indian workers - Times of India
I don't understand for the life of me why anyone would want to drastically increase the #.. especially of cultural misfits from the middle east. Why would Hilliary do that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
