The NYT Revives the Right Wing Conspiracy Theory (Mexican, ethical, legal)

[Dockside]

It's back.

With Trump's appointment of Steve Bannon, the NYT and the Hillary campaign shook the cobwebs off Hillary's infamous remark about right wing conspiracies. Robert Mook, her campaign manager, was the first to start floating the idea and now the NYT has been pressed into service to add legitimacy to the charge.

So first Democrats floated the idea that Hillary's emails were tainted with Russian lies in an attempt to inoculate her from further damaging email revelations Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies - POLITICO

Now the Hillary campaign and the NYT wants us to believe that every damaging charge from the Trump campaign is nothing more than fevered right wing conspiracies http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/us...-theories.html

This election continues to get ugly.

[saltine]

Originally Posted by Dockside

It's back.

With Trump's appointment of Steve Bannon, the NYT and the Hillary campaign shook the cobwebs off Hillary's infamous remark about right wing conspiracies. Robert Mook, her campaign manager, was the first to start floating the idea and now the NYT has been pressed into service to add legitimacy to the charge.

So first Democrats floated the idea that Hillary's emails were tainted with Russian lies in an attempt to inoculate her from further damaging email revelations Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies - POLITICO

Now the Hillary campaign and the NYT wants us to believe that every damaging charge from the Trump campaign is nothing more than fevered right wing conspiracies http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/us...-theories.html

This election continues to get ugly.

And the left Owns the ugly

[PedroMartinez]

Originally Posted by saltine

And the left Owns the ugly

Yes, they own it, but many Republicans helped consign the loan.

[AZLiam]

Originally Posted by Dockside

It's back.

With Trump's appointment of Steve Bannon, the NYT and the Hillary campaign shook the cobwebs off Hillary's infamous remark about right wing conspiracies. Robert Mook, her campaign manager, was the first to start floating the idea and now the NYT has been pressed into service to add legitimacy to the charge.

So first Democrats floated the idea that Hillary's emails were tainted with Russian lies in an attempt to inoculate her from further damaging email revelations Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies - POLITICO

Now the Hillary campaign and the NYT wants us to believe that every damaging charge from the Trump campaign is nothing more than fevered right wing conspiracies http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/us...-theories.html

This election continues to get ugly.

Sadly, the left tends to challenge anything that goes against its modus operandi and (along with its media lapdogs) resorts to providing false realities that they believe the uniformed citizens will buy into. They also like touting words like conspiracy theories, bogus, or myths. It's difficult for Dems to discount any myths when they don't even know and cannot prove whether or not they are myths to begin with. Furthermore, Clinton continues to be caught in lie after lie, so why in the world should anyone believe proven liars (and those who support them) when they attempt to brush off damaging charges as being "fevered conspiracies"?

[Kode]

Originally Posted by saltine

And the left Owns the ugly

Oh grow up.

[Kode]

Originally Posted by AZLiam

Sadly, the left tends to challenge anything that goes against its modus operandi and (along with its media lapdogs) resorts to providing false realities that they believe the uniformed citizens will buy into. They also like touting words like conspiracy theories, bogus, or myths. It's difficult for Dems to discount any myths when they don't even know and cannot prove whether or not they are myths to begin with. Furthermore, Clinton continues to be caught in lie after lie, so why in the world should anyone believe proven liars (and those who support them) when they attempt to brush off damaging charges as being "fevered conspiracies"?

The left? LOL!! Yes Clinton is a liar and should never have been the Dem's candidate, but get real: the republicans have a fascist with the support of white supremacists for a canadidate.

[AZLiam]

Originally Posted by Kode

The left? LOL!! Yes Clinton is a liar and should never have been the Dem's candidate, but get real: the republicans have a fascist with the support of white supremacists for a canadidate.

Go back to sleep.

[Kracer]

Originally Posted by Kode

Oh grow up.

and Mitt didn't pay taxes for 10 years!


and the famous Romney vs crawley/obama debate


NYT cops shoots unarmed man


NBC doctors 911 tape to inject racism in a shooting


al favoring obama admin and friends with no legal or ethical consequences


so yes the media and the former NYTs is now the official propaganda arm of the obama.clinton administration

[Mason3000]

Originally Posted by Dockside

It's back.

With Trump's appointment of Steve Bannon, the NYT and the Hillary campaign shook the cobwebs off Hillary's infamous remark about right wing conspiracies. Robert Mook, her campaign manager, was the first to start floating the idea and now the NYT has been pressed into service to add legitimacy to the charge.

So first Democrats floated the idea that Hillary's emails were tainted with Russian lies in an attempt to inoculate her from further damaging email revelations Democrats' new warning: Leaks could include Russian lies - POLITICO

Now the Hillary campaign and the NYT wants us to believe that every damaging charge from the Trump campaign is nothing more than fevered right wing conspiracies http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/us...-theories.html

This election continues to get ugly.

The NYT has zero credibility. They're just a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. Carlos Slim, the Mexican billionaire and second wealthiest man on the planet, owns controlling interest in the NYT now. Slim happens to also be the #1 largest private donator to the Clinton Foundation . That's how the Democratic Party & the mainstream media work these days folks. They're a cesspool.

[Mason3000]

Originally Posted by Kracer

and Mitt didn't pay taxes for 10 years!


and the famous Romney vs crawley/obama debate


NYT cops shoots unarmed man


NBC doctors 911 tape to inject racism in a shooting


al favoring obama admin and friends with no legal or ethical consequences


so yes the media and the former NYTs is now the official propaganda arm of the obama.clinton administration

- See post above. Carlos Slim, the largest private donator to the Clinton Foundation now owns controlling interest in the NYT. Game over at the Times.

- Someone else posted most of the list below (forgot who?).

* ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

* ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former Whitehouse Press Secretary Jay Carney

* ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama's Deputy Press Secretary

* ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama's Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

- Game over at ABC news.

* CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

- Game over at CBS news.

* CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton's Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

- Shooting victim's sister calls for violence, CNN edits it to a call for peace:
CNN Edits Police Shooting Victim

- CNN's Donna Brazille is outed in leaked emails as having colluded against Bernie, is named acting chairperson of the DNC, while remaining at CNN.
Donna Brazile at the DNC: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

- Game over at CNN

- Greg Sargent of the Washington Post outed in DNC leaked emails. 74 times he's mentioned by the Dems as an ally. The DNC was intentionally leaking stories to him before they broke so they could "get ahead of them" and have him to spin them in a friendly way to lead the conversation in that direction.
Donna Brazile at the DNC: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

- Game over at Washington Post

- Politico was also outed in the leaked DNC emails. Politico is so bad that 'Chief Investigative Reporter' Ken Vogel was actually writing up articles sympathetic to the Democrats and submitting them to the DNC for approval before publishing them.
Reporter Shares Draft Articles With DNC | The Daily Caller

- Game over at Politico