Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And I hope she wins! Whether Mr. Trump wins or not, trashing her served no purpose. More manipulation by the media trying to spoon feed us what they think we should hear & see because THEY have already decided who should win.
I'm no Trump supporter, but this woman seems fairly nice. I feel sorry for her. Why have we reduced ourselves to attacking people over their health problems, their family members ( Michelle Obama can testify to that ) and things that have absolutely no bearing on the candidate and their positions?
See, that's the problem here. When she's deposed for this suit, those questions will be asked, and she's going to have to give truthful answers. Her background is discoverable information, and if she lies to those direct questions, that's perjury.
It's going to be very interesting to see how this whole thing plays out. It might turn out that they would have been better off leaving this one alone.
Well, yes - as NLVgal points out, the suit she filed. You know, the subject of the thread?
I am not a lawyer, so let me get this straight. She is the injured party and files a law suit for slander. Why would she have to submit to a deposition and be required to answer any questions.
Trump and his lawyers would not have advised and allowed her to file the suit if they thought she might be deposed and her answers could open up a can of worms.
I am not a lawyer, so let me get this straight. She is the injured party and files a law suit for slander. Why would she have to submit to a deposition and be required to answer any questions.
Trump and his lawyers would not have advised and allowed her to file the suit if they thought she might be deposed and her answers could open up a can of worms.
Oh, yeah, absolutely. The plaintiff is the first party deposed. And they tend to ask a lot of personal questions in a case like this. That's what I find really surprising about this; she's going to get grilled like a polish sausage. Almost every salient detail about her background is discoverable - university records, immigration records, employment history... maybe even tax returns. Plaintiff's counsel will move to seal the testimony, but I'm not sure they'll be able to show grounds. The plaintiff is typically held to a higher standard, because they're the ones who made the decision to sue in the first place. This could become very interesting...
Trump has smeared the wives and spouses of his opponents. Melania is a third trophy wife with a questionable immigration background that doesn't even rate high enough to be individually named on the Trump campaign NDA. Beyond that, how many times have Republicans and the right wing media sunk to new depths with Michelle Obama?
**** Michelle Obama, the horse she rode in on and anyone that looks like her!
The above is type of ghetto attitude that Michelle Obama and anyone that looks like her has to deal with. Yet the First Lady always handles herself with class and grace.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
