Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bringing up past tax activity by any candidate is like beating a dead horse. If it was done legally because of a loop-hole then note that any savvy business person will take advantage of it, regardless of their political persuasion. Research and see who/what created the loop-hole in the first place. IMO, that would be more telling.
The candidate is promising to bring more of the same to the wealthy,,,that is His tax plan-- then promising more jobs because of it--
people just need to understand what he is doing that's all - transparent he has NOT been
Bringing up past tax activity by any candidate is like beating a dead horse. If it was done legally because of a loop-hole then note that any savvy business person will take advantage of it, regardless of their political persuasion. Research and see who/what created the loop-hole in the first place. IMO, that would be more telling.
"Loop holes" is thrown around like "racist", sexist" and other words.
There is NO such thing as a "loop hole".
The law is the law. Period!
Are people who use the marriage deduction and the mortgage deductions using "loop holes" to avoid paying taxes?
The candidate is promising to bring more of the same to the wealthy,,,that is His tax plan-- then promising more jobs because of it--
people just need to understand what he is doing that's all - transparent he has NOT been
Maybe you should actually READ it before making claims and making a fool of yourself.
But, then again you DO have the perfect screen name.
The problem isn't so much that Trump didn't pay taxes, if he followed the law. It's that he LOST almost a BILLION dollars. His business sense was supposed to compensate for his lack of political experience, but now we know that he's not even a competent business person.
The problem isn't so much that Trump didn't pay taxes, if he followed the law. It's that he LOST almost a BILLION dollars. His business sense was supposed to compensate for his lack of political experience, but now we know that he's not even a competent business person.
You nailed it.
6 bankruptcies over 20 years
Forced to sell other businesses at a loss
$ billions in losses
Being deposed as Chairman of the Board by shareholders of his publicly -traded company ( Trump Entertainment in 2009)
Far more concerning is the unprecedented conflicts of interest that exist going forward if elected POTUS. He owes $ billions to domestic and foreign banks. He has business interests in the Middle East. Transferring operation to his children does nothing to eliminate the conflicts of interest that will exist.
The Clinton Foundation should have been closed while she was SoS to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest. Instead, donations were solicited from people who might reasonably expect quid pro quo. Can't prove or disprove Pay for Play.
320 million people and we end up with these two on a ballot.
There's a reason why both are trending unfavorable.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
