Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would it upset you if you had been accused and locked up by the feds without bail, to find out at trial, they had altered evidence they presented on 7 accounts.
Then when your attorney presents evidence of the proof, that the evidence presented by the prosecution had been altered, it was discarded as trash by the judge.
Would you think it was a rigged system?
Would it upset you if you had been accused and locked up by the feds without bail, to find out at trial, they had altered evidence they presented on 7 accounts.
Then when your attorney presents evidence of the proof, that the evidence presented by the prosecution had been altered, it was discarded as trash by the judge.
Would you think it was a rigged system?
yes i would be upset, but it is called reversible error and would generally be tossed out at the appellate level.
Quote:
Originally Posted by madison999
Normally you would never actually get ahold of the evidence.
And correct judges don't want to hear it
actually the prosecution has to turn over ALL evidence they have against you, its called discovery, and if the prosecution does not turn over all evidence, especially exculpatory evidence, they can be not only censured by the court for prosecutorial misconduct, the appellate court can and generally will set aside a conviction.
Would it upset you if you had been accused and locked up by the feds without bail, to find out at trial, they had altered evidence they presented on 7 accounts.
Then when your attorney presents evidence of the proof, that the evidence presented by the prosecution had been altered, it was discarded as trash by the judge.
Would you think it was a rigged system?
Yeah, I would be very mad.
Actually, I've wondered at times, with the advancements in technology, if some citizen, foe, or even government agents that wanted to get someone they hated, if they could planet child porn on their enemy's computer. You know... as a set up?
But I know little to nothing about computer forensics, so, I have no idea how likely or successful someone could frame another person like that. And you due process goes out the window for 99 percent of the US population when they hear someone is accused of anything related with pedophilia. They are pro-guilty before proven innocent. Actually, most are simply pro-guilty if they see a news story saying x was found on a guy's property or he is accused. Minus Michael Jackson.
Actually, Hillary Clinton is above the law too. She could abduct and eat children and she would still have a faithful cult following, along with US Governmnet agencies scrambling to protect her from prosecution.
Would it upset you if you had been accused and locked up by the feds without bail, to find out at trial, they had altered evidence they presented on 7 accounts.
Then when your attorney presents evidence of the proof, that the evidence presented by the prosecution had been altered, it was discarded as trash by the judge.
Would you think it was a rigged system?
A case that is at trial right now, where the evidence has being altered by the prosecution and the judge is allowing it in to the trial.
It is a rather high profile case.
Just wanted to get a feel, for who believes it is right or wrong, before I spill the beans, to see if this really is about justice, the constitution and the law.
A case that is at trial right now, where the evidence has being altered by the prosecution and the judge is allowing it in to the trial.
It is a rather high profile case.
Just wanted to get a feel, for who believes it is right or wrong, before I spill the beans, to see if this really is about justice, the constitution and the law.
What specific case is it? I want to look it up. There is always at least two sides to each story...
What specific case is it? I want to look it up. There is always at least two sides to each story...
It is on going litigation, some here like to discuss. Just asking if evidence that helps you is altered to hurt you, how would you feel? Like they were out to set you up to take a fall?
Remember, the right to remain silent, only applies to you. Not the prosecution.
Everything will be used against you. And nothing to help you. Gotcha
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
