Judge dismisses Newtown lawsuit (ethical, illegal, attorney, death)

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Judges rule on the law, funny that when it doesn't go a certain way it's a conspiracy.

Didn't notice, they said "sometimes"? It was right there.

[BentBow]

There would have been outrage from every gun owner and manufacturer, if this had went the other way.

You have to hold the individual responsible and liable, for the misuse of a tool, that cause harm to another individual.

The tool wasn't defective. The tools user was.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Slater

Looks like this went the same way as the Colorado theatre shooting lawsuit. In this case, is the losing side also liable for all court costs?:

Lawsuit Filed by Families of Newtown Shooting Victims Dismissed by Connecticut Judge - ABC News

"Judge Barbara Bellis wrote in her ruling that the plaintiffs “seek damages for harms, including the deaths of the plaintiffs’ decedents, that were caused solely by the criminal misuse of a weapon"

Can you imagine the precedent this could create?

Auto makers sued because some nut killed someone with a car.

Beer makers sued because some nut got drunk and caused harm.

Knives, blunt instruments like baseball bats, (which are used to kill MORE then rifles), swimming pools, etc.

This so-called lawyer who took this case in nothing more then a bottom feeding money seeking scum bag who KNEW he didn't stands a snow ball's chance in hell of winning yet, he dragged these people through hell, AGAIN.

His type should be dis-barred!

[e30is]

Would you sue the makers of the alcohol that Brock Turner used to get drunk and rape his victim?

[lepoisson]

Looks like Hillary doesn't agree with the judge's ruling.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...82868522618880

"It's incomprehensible that our laws would protect gun makers over Sandy Hook families. We need to fix this."

[stburr91]

Originally Posted by lepoisson

Looks like Hillary doesn't agree with the judge's ruling.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...82868522618880

"It's incomprehensible that our laws would protect gun makers over Sandy Hook families. We need to fix this."

God, Hillary is such a danger to our civil rights.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by lepoisson

Looks like Hillary doesn't agree with the judge's ruling.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...82868522618880

"It's incomprehensible that our laws would protect gun makers over Sandy Hook families. We need to fix this."

Glad I don't have a twitter!
I'd be kicked off and the feds would be knocking on my door.

[engineman]

Common sense prevailed. Should a tool maker be responsible for a lunatic who got his hands on a chain saw?

Perhaps the state is responsible because the lunatic wasn't in the nut house?

[NxtGen]

Originally Posted by PedroMartinez

They should be liable for the legal costs.

Depends on state. I think Texas has a law where the loser picks up the tab.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by NxtGen

Depends on state. I think Texas has a law where the loser picks up the tab.

Tort reform.

Better have a good case and better have bullet proof evidence, to support that case.