Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-17-2016, 09:56 AM
 
550 posts, read 368,594 times
Reputation: 883

Advertisements

Thanks to WikiLeaks, we now know the details of that Uranium One deal in which a Canadian businessman got Bill Clinton to help him get control of uranium mining fields in Kazakhstan.

The businessman soon gave $31 million to the Clinton Foundation, with a pledge of $100 million more. Uranium One acquired significant holdings in the U.S.

A Russian company moved to buy it. The deal needed U.S. approval, including from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

While it was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation received more money from Uranium One. Bill Clinton got a $500,000 speech fee. Mrs. Clinton approved the deal.

The Russian company is now one of the world’s largest uranium producers. Significant amounts of U.S. uranium are, in effect, owned by Russia.

WikiLeaks dump showed the State Department warning that Russia was moving to control the global supply of nuclear fuel. The deal went through anyway, and the foundation flourished.

Here's good article on how this worked from the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2016, 10:32 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,728,101 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotpair View Post
Thanks to WikiLeaks, we now know the details of that Uranium One deal in which a Canadian businessman got Bill Clinton to help him get control of uranium mining fields in Kazakhstan.

The businessman soon gave $31 million to the Clinton Foundation, with a pledge of $100 million more. Uranium One acquired significant holdings in the U.S.

A Russian company moved to buy it. The deal needed U.S. approval, including from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

While it was under consideration, the Clinton Foundation received more money from Uranium One. Bill Clinton got a $500,000 speech fee. Mrs. Clinton approved the deal.

The Russian company is now one of the world’s largest uranium producers. Significant amounts of U.S. uranium are, in effect, owned by Russia.

WikiLeaks dump showed the State Department warning that Russia was moving to control the global supply of nuclear fuel. The deal went through anyway, and the foundation flourished.

Here's good article on how this worked from the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0

That is minor compared to the Clinton Foundation stealing the mineral rights of Haiti and giving them to Hillary's brother Hugh Rodham for gold mining. It is against the Haiti constitution for any foreign entity to control their mineral rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Wait for all the pro-Hillary folks to come swooping in to say these are all lies meant to hijack the election....lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Richmond,VA
3,840 posts, read 3,066,312 times
Reputation: 2825
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Wait for all the pro-Hillary folks to come swooping in to say these are all lies meant to hijack the election....lol.

They are over at HuffPost waiting for their talking points. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Commie View Post
Doesn't matter. Drumpf is losing. When that happens, will you point guns at the cops?
What an absolutely stupid question. I should have stopped reading when I reached the ever intelligent "Drumpf".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2016, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZUMAN View Post
They are over at HuffPost waiting for their talking points. lol
That's funny, but I think they already have those down pat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top