Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We have written frequently about the internal Clinton Foundation power struggle between Chelsea Clinton and Doug Band over the previous couple of weeks (see here, here and here). It all started back in 2011 when, as Chelsea started to take a more senior role at the Clinton Foundation, she became increasingly concerned about an internal audit that exposed glaring conflicts of interest throughout the Foundation with an emphasis on Doug Band and his company, Teneo, who she thought had inappropriately sought favors from the State Department during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State. A Politico article from March 2015, summarized Chelsea's rise at the Foundation and how it threatened some long-time Clinton allies who had grown quite accustomed to the status quo.
Now, new WikiLeaks emails reveal additional details behind the the man, Eric Braverman, who was brought in as CEO by Chelsea to change the controversial practices of the Foundation but abruptly resigned a short time later after being pushed out by long-time Clinton loyalists who had apparently grown very comfortable with the status quo.
Here is a politico article that talks about how Braverman was trying to reform the Clinton Foundation, but was forced out by Bill Clinton's old friends at the foundation.
I've been saying the Russian thing has been bs from day 1. If you are smart enough to hack for the Russian government, then you are smart enough to make it look like someone else did it.
We have written frequently about the internal Clinton Foundation power struggle between Chelsea Clinton and Doug Band over the previous couple of weeks (see here, here and here). It all started back in 2011 when, as Chelsea started to take a more senior role at the Clinton Foundation, she became increasingly concerned about an internal audit that exposed glaring conflicts of interest throughout the Foundation with an emphasis on Doug Band and his company, Teneo, who she thought had inappropriately sought favors from the State Department during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State. A Politico article from March 2015, summarized Chelsea's rise at the Foundation and how it threatened some long-time Clinton allies who had grown quite accustomed to the status quo.
Now, new WikiLeaks emails reveal additional details behind the the man, Eric Braverman, who was brought in as CEO by Chelsea to change the controversial practices of the Foundation but abruptly resigned a short time later after being pushed out by long-time Clinton loyalists who had apparently grown very comfortable with the status quo.
Here is a politico article that talks about how Braverman was trying to reform the Clinton Foundation, but was forced out by Bill Clinton's old friends at the foundation.
I've been saying the Russian thing has been bs from day 1. If you are smart enough to hack for the Russian government, then you are smart enough to make it look like someone else did it.
The typical way hilllary does things, talk about WHERE the emails came from INSTEAD of the content of them.
I've been saying the Russian thing has been bs from day 1. If you are smart enough to hack for the Russian government, then you are smart enough to make it look like someone else did it.
I wonder if you realize that you just stated that it's highly probable that the Russians were indeed behind the hacking.
I've been saying the Russian thing has been bs from day 1. If you are smart enough to hack for the Russian government, then you are smart enough to make it look like someone else did it.
If the Russians are this smart then we should accept their supremacy.
Of course the most popular word, when people like to have it both ways for capable but despicable enemy to maximize the threat , is clever.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.