Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2016, 01:29 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 788,184 times
Reputation: 813

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
What is your source for this?
I misspoke. He has been reported and will hopefully be investigated for the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2016, 01:36 PM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,890,528 times
Reputation: 1266
Oh noes... what will we do?

How about we charge him and put him in jail as well?

What is that? Did you progressives think we would act like you and immediately jump to defend criminal behavior?

Sorry, some of us don't believe "the end justifies the means" and so we, unlike some of you, we have integrity.

Now come back and tell us how Hillary is so innocent and how she is your favorite Marxist!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,903 posts, read 5,571,335 times
Reputation: 22059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassy Fae View Post
I misspoke. He has been reported and will hopefully be investigated for the same.
For the same what?? What exactly do you think was "reported" that wasn't already openly known?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 01:40 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 788,184 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by carolac View Post
See this is exactly what is wrong with regurgitating inaccurate information like the media does. Politicus is a hack website that has been called on the carpet before for its inaccurate "reporting." Politicus nor the OP know the difference between a private server and a private email account, yet they both perpetuate the lie that Chaffetz had a private server when he had a gmail account like many other Senators, Dem and Pub alike, that serve with integrity.
The DCAT indeed reported him. Politco got it from their statement.
Democratic Coalition Against Trump

Quote:
Before 2013, there was no way for the government to secure two email accounts on a Blackberry. So our government leaders were required to carry two devices. It is very likely leaders received sensitive email on their Blackberry devices, contrary to what you state below,
No, Hillary requested a secure blackberry at the beginning of her tenure and was denied due to a lack of capability statement.

Quote:
since they were secure, unless they had two email accounts. It is very understandable that our government leaders would not want to carry two devices, and did not want the government IT department to control every bit of data on their phones. It is even understandable why a separate server would be desirable before 2013 to keep a bunch of personal emails out of FOIA productions. It would have been very difficult to manage at Clinton's level, as we have seen.

Clearly the OP does not understand the difficulty our government leaders have in determining what is or should be classified and what is not, or else you are intentionally manipulating a lie.
What lie? I know full well there is disagreement about what is or is not to be classified. That has been plainly stated. The reality is that using a private email for government business will open a person to the possibility of receiving classified information in that private email. Hence him being rightly reported.

Quote:
Comey testified that Clinton lied to the FBI,
That is a lie. Comey stated that he did not believe that Hillary lied to the FBI. It's illegal to lie to the FBI. She would have been prosecuted if he thought that.

Quote:
and that she and her staff were grossly negligent in the handling of classified information through her private server, and we now know that at least five foreign entities hacked into and obtained government information.
From her server? Another lie.

Quote:
Intent is not an element in the statutes that Clinton violated as envisioned by the authors of the statutes, but the FBI applied a rarely (and I mean "rarely") used intent, essentially "rewriting" the statutes to give Clinton a pass. Clinton got a pass, and you just need to admit it. There is no way you can sugar coat that with your little percentages.

Do I think a former first lady should be indicated for that? No, I do not, but I think she should be disqualified from running for president because she lacks judgment to be president. We will see.
Bull. Another person who did not watch the hearings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 01:49 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,622 posts, read 44,365,850 times
Reputation: 13555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassy Fae View Post
No, there are hundreds of thousands of Weiner's emails. You need to put on your thinking cap. Do you think TSC information was being sent to Hillary's blackberry?
Yes. That, or whatever device she was using at the time. The point was it was being sent to and from her via her private unsecured server. Plus, if she forwarded copies of them to Huma, either deliberately or just as a blanket inbox rule because Huma was Hillary's Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Dept while also doing consulting work for the Clinton Foundation and Teneo at the same time, they're all on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

Are you really that unaware of what went on? And you plan to vote based on that lack of info?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 02:02 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,622 posts, read 44,365,850 times
Reputation: 13555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassy Fae View Post
And Hillary never received or sent a properly marked classified email via her private server.
Yes, she did. Her excuse was that she didn't know what the 'C' designation meant.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ils-were-meant

And furthermore, if she lacks the comprehension and judgment to understand that something could very well be classified info even if she didn't know what the 'C' meant, she's NOT fit to serve as POTUS.

Why are you so hell-bent on defending someone so utterly incompetent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 02:07 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 788,184 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
For the same what?? What exactly do you think was "reported" that wasn't already openly known?
To have his email account probed for classified information. Hillary's account was openly known as well. She wasn't reported until she decided to run for POTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 02:08 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,622 posts, read 44,365,850 times
Reputation: 13555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
For the same what?? What exactly do you think was "reported" that wasn't already openly known?
Exactly. An email account and an email server are two VERY different things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 02:09 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 788,184 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes. That, or whatever device she was using at the time. The point was it was being sent to and from her via her private unsecured server. Plus, if she forwarded copies of them to Huma, either deliberately or just as a blanket inbox rule because Huma was Hillary's Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Dept while also doing consulting work for the Clinton Foundation and Teneo at the same time, they're all on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

Are you really that unaware of what went on? And you plan to vote based on that lack of info?
They stated in the hearings that she never forwarded anything. She made some responses to forwards. That was it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2016, 02:13 PM
 
1,640 posts, read 788,184 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. An email account and an email server are two VERY different things.
What difference would it make? All the yelling was about the fact that her system could've been vulnerable to for an entry. The same goes for any public server
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top