Clinton losers just shut up about blaming race and whites (racism, treason)

[shiftymh]

Liberal logic: Minorities voting for a candidate at a 90% rate = good, open-minded but whites voting for a candidate at a 65% = intolerant, racist

[lionking]

Originally Posted by bg7

Loser. Not "Loosers"
Lose and loose are two different words and are pronounced differently and mean different things.

thanks fixed it, was typing fast because phone was ringing...

[lionking]

Originally Posted by bassetluv

*sigh*

I tuned in NPR this morning, all the *experts* on the democratic side answering why he won, mentioned race and whites in every sentence. Same here on replies on threads from some Clinton supporters. They just don't get it.

[mrpeatie]

I think there was definitely a racial component to some degree but that alone would not have won it. A lot of voters had some very valid complaints/criticism of Hilary. Others simply identify too strongly with conservative principles to put their vote anywhere else. The real kicker was people who feel the economy/business environment are being rigged towards the wealthy and the powers that be. Clinton's close Wall Street ties really killed her with those folks.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by Dockside

Van Jones can't stop having hissy fits.

CNN's Van Jones gets emotional about 'whitelash'

meant to post this when I first saw it.

pretty soon we're going to need hip waders to navigate the prog tear flood.

[tinytrump]

as if we have enslaved and oppressed anyone -- hmmph lets not go there

[Loveshiscountry]

Originally Posted by trlhiker

Gee I don't remember conservatives shutting up the last 8 years.

Someone has to remind you of all your horrible progressive policies that failed.

[tinytrump]

Originally Posted by markjames68

if by "old" you mean 40+, then sure. As well as those making more than $50K. Given the expectations Trump did well with the Hispanic and college-educated women votes.

The link also takes you the age etc. it's the old white men- that made the difference- I would also add angry- I expect this as much when Obama got in- and the pew report or Census that said the whites were down from 50% of the total population-- Ok so you got Trump, and the Reps in the congress-- let see what changes...

[7Millionaire7]

I think the issue is that a lot of non-white people have and wonder is: how did some of the racist, misogynistic and isolationist comments made by Trump not push someone who IS White to NOT vote for Trump.

In combination with the fact that the GOP for all intents and purposes has mostly been a party made up of predominantly White people... it just kind of sticks out. according to early demographic analysis by the Economist no more than 25% of any group of color voted his way. And he improved on Romney's numbers in those groups.

Along with age factors and the fact that most of the youth in this country are of color... a vote for Trump speaks cultural volumes.

[veezybell]

Originally Posted by bg7

Loser. Not "Loosers"
Lose and loose are two different words and are pronounced differently and mean different things.

C'mon OP...get it together.

Originally Posted by trlhiker

Gee I don't remember conservatives shutting up the last 8 years.

Good point. Now let's see how the Lefties cry about the next four.

Originally Posted by tinytrump

mostly what we know old white men - and their wives-voted for Trump


Exit Polls 2016

So...only white people voted for Trump?

Originally Posted by shiftymh

Liberal logic: Minorities voting for a candidate at a 90% rate = good, open-minded but whites voting for a candidate at a 65% = intolerant, racist

Exactly.

Originally Posted by tinytrump

as if we have enslaved and oppressed anyone -- hmmph lets not go there

There are forum members here that owned slaves?? Holy crap!