Are liberals mad because they couldn't elect another "first?"
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Democrats and mainstream media made a big deal over the "historic" election of a "first black president." They wanted to repeat that with the "first woman president!" Are they just bitter that even though the media, celebrities, and Obama primed Hillary for a "historic first" that they were defeated in an upset?
They already had the first woman president, the girlyman will leave office in January. You would have a hard time findon one more feminine that good old Barrack... Even his transgender wife isn't as femiinine as he..
The Democrats and mainstream media made a big deal over the "historic" election of a "first black president." They wanted to repeat that with the "first woman president!" Are they just bitter that even though the media, celebrities, and Obama primed Hillary for a "historic first" that they were defeated in an upset?
And look at how their "first black president" worked out. America had enough and the election proved it.
either 'party' could have had 'the first' women POTUS
the fascist liberals chose Hitlery....the states said 'no thank you' give us a better choice of a 'first woman to be POTUS'
hitlery was/is anti woman, anti black, ann anti American
the states saw through the baggage of the Clinton crime family
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.