Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Give up your dough and spread some of YOUR wealth around from your crooked Ponzi schemes. Don't you love these hypocritical scum saying how much they care for Joe Schmo yet they run to their mansions in gated communities
President-elect Trump is probably going to cancel an entitlement program or two. Nancy Pelosi and her liberatti will immediately claim that he is killing the poor people or some such nonsense.
Trump could blunt the impact of the left's complaints if, at the same time he announced the termination of a program, he also announced the account number at the Treaury Department to which those who were really concerned about the people could donate money to keep the program afloat. (Pelosi happens to be incredibly weathy.) In fact, he could double down by stating that at the end of every month, Treasury would happily announce how much was donated for each program cancelled - and by whom.
By the third month, donations would melt away like an April snow shower. The monthly Treasury announcement would reflect that. That's when the world would finally realize that the liberals love to 'solve' problems with other people's money, but the minute they have to personally pay for it, maybe the cause wasn't so important after all.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,485,136 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rescue3
Here, let's put it on track.
President-elect Trump is probably going to cancel an entitlement program or two. Nancy Pelosi and her liberatti will immediately claim that he is killing the poor people or some such nonsense.
Trump could blunt the impact of the left's complaints if, at the same time he announced the termination of a program, he also announced the account number at the Treaury Department to which those who were really concerned about the people could donate money to keep the program afloat. (Pelosi happens to be incredibly weathy.) In fact, he could double down by stating that at the end of every month, Treasury would happily announce how much was donated for each program cancelled - and by whom.
By the third month, donations would melt away like an April snow shower. The monthly Treasury announcement would reflect that. That's when the world would finally realize that the liberals love to 'solve' problems with other people's money, but the minute they have to personally pay for it, maybe the cause wasn't so important after all.
I always hear this line of reasoning from libertatians/conservsatives, but it is just posturing. Fact is, having everyone chip in a little is much easier than a few people chipping in a boatload; the whole line of reasoning is just selfish
OP, it's just like Obamacare which depended on the young who said they believe in socialism. But when it came time for them to pay up out of their pocket, they aren't so socialist after all.
OP, it's just like Obamacare which depended on the young who said they believe in socialism. But when it came time for them to pay up out of their pocket, they aren't so socialist after all.
I used the ACA when I needed to. I had no problem paying for it and was happy it was available.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
