Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And when in history has that happened. When I was in my 20s I thought I was invincible and I was upset I had to pay car insurance. Lol. I didn't get health insurance till I got my first UNION job. And I paid ZERO for it and NEVER used it till I had a kid. Once again. Why would anyone pay money (when they have brutal college loans to pay) for something they will not use?
Risk averse. All millennials I know have health insurance, and purposely chose careers which feature employers offering quality coverage.
Price would go down if it wasn't packed with bloated crap.
I'm sure childless couples love paying for pediatric dental coverage, or two gay men paying for maternity coverage.
Sure, but those are mandated by government. Guess what? Men have to pay for coverage for mammograms and everything related to women's health. That shouldn't happen, either. Glad you agree. Get government out of healthcare, you'll get rid of these scenarios.
Then, like me, enjoy its long overdue demise. I want only legislation every voting Congressman in either chamber has read. in FULL. Before voting.
You shouldn't celebrate because the replacement is going to be equally bad, since everyone on both sides is saying they're going to keep the "pre-existing conditions" stipulation and probably they'll try to reconstruct it "except better" (which means worse).
Sure, but those are mandated by government. Guess what? Men have to pay for coverage for mammograms and everything related to women's health. That shouldn't happen, either. Glad you agree. Get government out of healthcare, you'll get rid of these scenarios.
You do know who approves plans and sets min standards of coverage, as well as premium pmpm, right?
You shouldn't celebrate because the replacement is going to be equally bad, since everyone on both sides is saying they're going to keep the "pre-existing conditions" stipulation and probably they'll try to reconstruct it "except better" (which means worse).
No one knows yet. Personally I think we should have a multi-priced system, based on risk and overall health of those seeking insurance. Just like auto insurance has high risk pools.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
