Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, I didn't. I said that they should have done a better job at vetting their mate. And then you said that reality is that people change. And I said that if that is reality and everyone besides me knows that, then everyone should REALLY do a better job at vetting their mate, since they know how randomly they change. You just reinforced my argument.
I'm just trying to figure out what exactly you are talking about. So you send money to the government, telling them to have it sent to poor people?
And now your bizarre argument is that since I didn't personally direct the government where to send my taxes, but they did it anyways, that the money is not from me? Please, continue. I'm sure this is persuading millions of people with your cogent argument.
No, I didn't. I said that they should have done a better job at vetting their mate. And then you said that reality is that people change. And I said that if that is reality and everyone besides me knows that, then everyone should REALLY do a better job at vetting their mate, since they know how randomly they change. You just reinforced my argument.
Yup.. repeating yourself and placing the blame on the mother is a great argument.
We have a very high divorce rate in this country.... I suppose they all suck at vetting out their mate as well.
The consequence is placing a child into foster care/adoption as an alternative to ripping them out of a loving family because of their financial situation.
Pretty much. But if they got divorced before having kids, at least that would be more intelligent. I presume you agree.
That's not reality...
Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit
Conservatives want to deport whole families including the American born children under the premise of keeping families together but an abandoned mother with children is ok to split up?
...
Next you will say that children thrown into the adoption system will magically come out of it perfect well adjusted individuals without repercussions of being stripped of the family that loved them.
And now your bizarre argument is that since I didn't personally direct the government where to send my taxes, but they did it anyways, that the money is not from me? Please, continue. I'm sure this is persuading millions of people with your cogent argument.
Sure.. continue to think that you personally are paying for these programs. As if a lower population in America is suddenly going to make your taxes go down.
Sure.. continue to think that you personally are paying for these programs. As if a lower population in America is suddenly going to make your taxes go down.
Oh, wait, now you're going off on a tangent about how I supposedly claimed my taxes would decrease if there were fewer people.
Sure.. continue to think that you personally are paying for these programs. As if a lower population in America is suddenly going to make your taxes go down.
Certainly not if we start removing children from homes and throwing them into foster/adoption system...
Yup.. repeating yourself and placing the blame on the mother is a great argument.
We have a very high divorce rate in this country.... I suppose they all suck at vetting out their mate as well.
The consequence is placing a child into foster care/adoption as an alternative to ripping them out of a loving family because of their financial situation.
Very high divorce rate but that doesn't stop people from getting married or require a ban for people getting married... makes the divorce rate seem irrelevant....
Adoption is always an option, but I am still pro-choice... I won't stop a woman from making a decision, but I don't think the government should pay for that decision... without PP, I would think the demographics of this country would be 30-45% black by now... imagine who would have political control of the government, the life of current African Americans would be dramatically different with that kind of majority, but all of that was done away by the white liberal... ironic that African Americans voted for the political party that doomed them for all those years...
Donald Trump dismissed the notion he is not a true conservative because he supports Planned Parenthood, insisting he is "just doing what's right."
Look, Planned Parenthood has done very good work for many, many -- for millions of women," Trump said in a news conference Tuesday night. "And I’ll say it, and I know a lot of the so-called conservatives, they say that’s really ... cause I’m a conservative, but I’m a common-sense conservative."
Trump continued, “I would look at the good aspects of [Planned Parenthood], and I would also look, because I’m sure they do some things properly and good and that are good for women, and I would look at that, and I would look at other aspects also. But we have to take care of women.”
Speaking from Palm Beach, Fla., the real-estate mogul reiterated he would not fund the organization "as long as you have the abortion going on," but noted the "millions of people -- and I’ve had thousands of letters from women -- that have been helped."
"And this wasn’t a set-up. This was women writing letters. But I’m going to be really good for women, I’m going to be good for women’s health issues, it’s very important to me. Very important to me," he said.
Trump then conceded that "maybe that’s not a perfect conservative view." But he insisted he's "more conservative than anybody on the military, on taking care of our vets, on the border, on the wall, on getting rid of Obamacare and coming up with something much, much better and certainly getting rid of Common Core.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.