Ex-CIA operative: We may need a new vote (CNN, O.J. Simpson, Minnesota)

[BajanYankee]

I wonder how that would work with the inauguration a little more than a month away.

Ex-CIA operative: We may need a new vote - CNN Video

[PullMyFinger]

God CNN is a pathetic piece of garbage that they would run this guy.

The fact that Trump almost won Minnesota, one of the most liberal states in the country and a state that does not use internet connected voting machines is proof positive that people voted for Trump. It's that simple.

How low is CNN going to sink?

[BajanYankee]

Originally Posted by PullMyFinger

God CNN is a pathetic piece of garbage that they would run this guy.

The fact that Trump almost won Minnesota, one of the most liberal states in the country and a state that does not use internet connected voting machines is proof positive that people voted for Trump. It's that simple.

How low is CNN going to sink?

So that means you're against a new vote?

[stburr91]

Originally Posted by PullMyFinger

God CNN is a pathetic piece of garbage that they would run this guy.

The fact that Trump almost won Minnesota, one of the most liberal states in the country and a state that does not use internet connected voting machines is proof positive that people voted for Trump. It's that simple.

How low is CNN going to sink?

Yes, CNN has no credibility, and has become a complete joke that everyone but the dems are laughing at.

[FirebirdCamaro1220]

Originally Posted by BajanYankee

So that means you're against a new vote?

Of course he is, PMF is a Trump supporter

[stburr91]

I can't help to wonder if the alleged ex-CIA operative says there needs to be a new vote because 60% of the votes in Detroit showed signs of fraud, and had to be discarded from the recount.

Trump would have really won by a much larger landslide if you removed the fraud from the democrats.

You know things are bad when a judge has to step in and stop a recount because of all the fraud by the democrats being exposed.

[mountainrose]

Highlight of the day -- my liberal neighbor saw that on CNN and said she is getting really sick of CNN and their fear-mongering and extreme bias.

[ATX Wahine]

Originally Posted by BajanYankee

So that means you're against a new vote?

Absolutely. Until the moment that irrefutable proof that actual election fraud occurred is presented by an official source tasked with the thorough investigation that concludes beyond any reasonable doubt that fraud cost the U.S. a fair presidential election, ANYTHING on the topic is just speculation. Nothing more.

[PedroMartinez]

CNN, the group that gave Hillary questions in advance?

[BajanYankee]

Originally Posted by Nor Cal Wahine

Absolutely. Until the moment that irrefutable proof that actual election fraud occurred is presented by an official source tasked with the thorough investigation that concludes beyond any reasonable doubt that fraud cost the U.S. a fair presidential election, ANYTHING on the topic is just speculation. Nothing more.

There is no irrefutable proof from which a jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that O.J. Simpson murdered two people.

And why would we apply a criminal burden of proof standard in our intelligence gathering? That's not what the C.I.A. does. It's not a law enforcement agency.