Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:08 PM
 
26 posts, read 9,892 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Looks like an Obama Socialist has joined CD. At least he's not blamed it all on white men.
Stop using terms you heard on TV.

And no I don't want a house in DFW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:11 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,678,440 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by snufftherooster View Post
Thanks to Trump. "Prove it" you say? It's called the Stock Market Casino and it's participation is by and large only the top 10% of Americans.

At the same time news is out that young people can't afford to buy their own homes anymore once they become adults. News is also out that violence has been shown over history as the most effective and used response to re-balance inequality.

So how long until this whole house of cards comes tumbling?

Facts Again - top 10% are richer. Young people can't afford to buy houses. Violence proven in history as means cultures re-allocate wealth.
Okay, the reality is 0bama and his domestic policies have been in place for eight years. He added $10 trillion to our debt, and QE 1-4 (Quantitative Easing) added about $4 trillion more, and where did all that extra money go?

Did that $14 trillion go to the poor????
No.

Did that $14 trillion go to the middle income families?
No.

So, you tell me, who got richer under 0bama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,330,946 times
Reputation: 15291
The one percent will always get richer. They had more to start with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:14 PM
 
1,008 posts, read 487,346 times
Reputation: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
The one percent will always get richer. They had more to start with.
lolno
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:31 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23891
Quote:
Originally Posted by snufftherooster View Post
Yes and blacks are rising. That much is true. Whites on the other hand...

There's no substitute for hard work. Ok, let's get that out of the way. However, hard work in Bangladesh and hard work in NYC yield two different outcomes. Hard work knowing Carlos Slim is not the same outcome as hard work knowing Police officer Carlos Slim.

Part of our nation has seen hardwork not amount to much, they've given up, and we see the results. Black people are going to be key in preventing upheavel because we can all see the rise out of poverty for many.
You will never be able to equate outcomes. NEVER.

You need to give that up.

Equal opportunity - great.

Equal outcome - chasing after unicorns and rainbows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,682 posts, read 14,648,352 times
Reputation: 15410
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJR1 View Post
lolno
"The one percent" is easier to say, but people making these points would be more correct if they used "the top one-tenth of one percent", as Sanders does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:41 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rescue3 View Post
How the heck are you measuring 'richer'? You mean by wealth? Is that bank account or stock portfolio?

Money in the US loses value at 2.2% per annum, which is less than any interest bearing savings account I currently know about.

Truth be told, market forces (not Trump) control the actual value of both. I know lots of millionaires who became thousandaires in 2008 - through no act of their own. Most IRAs for teachers, cops, firefighters, union members, and independents have stock as a portion of their portfolios. Hardly the top 10%.

Your last sentence is pure Marxist-Leninist pablum. Please Google "Fall of the Soviet Union..."
I wonder if our educational system leaves out the study of Marxist-Leninist and Communism because people surely don't understand how their leaders rule through fear. Millions of people always end up dead. Marxist-Leninist Communism believe of poverty, death and destruction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:47 PM
 
1,008 posts, read 487,346 times
Reputation: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
"The one percent" is easier to say, but people making these points would be more correct if they used "the top one-tenth of one percent", as Sanders does.
true. I am a 1%'er and while I can easily afford the bottle of Cristal I certainly can't afford the yacht to drink it on.

I also drive a used car, remodeled my bathroom myself, and clip coupons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:47 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
The one percent will always get richer. They had more to start with.
This is where many go wrong. Most people are not lucky enough to inherit a lot of money and of those who do, many spend it frivolously. People who are smart with their money invest / build wealth. There is no magic wand no matter what anyone including politicians tell you and no matter how much you b*tch nothing is going to change it either.

I'll help you out.... think of it this way.... every time you spend your money frivolously, every time you use debt to buy something that takes money out of your pocket and loses value, you're making some else richer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2016, 01:49 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by snufftherooster View Post
Thanks to Trump.
I don't normally take the side of Trump, but you really can't blame wealth inequality on him, or the housing costs, or anything else like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top