Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:05 PM
 
12,039 posts, read 6,570,692 times
Reputation: 13981

Advertisements

They found a smart democrat. ????!.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,823 posts, read 24,908,096 times
Reputation: 28520
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
They found a smart democrat. ????!.
No, it was a false alarm. Either they are incredibly elusive, or there is no such thing as an intelligent democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:15 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
I'm still going to respond.

Democrats potentially had the best candidate to run for office in decades.... Jim Webb. He's an honorable guy and I would likely have voted for him. However, Jim Webb was a little too honorable for today's Democratic Party. Thus, he didn't have a snowball's chance in hell.

I agree but think he is too honorable for today's inept 2 party system that's likely a bigger threat to this country than most things that have people in fear. He was the only declared candidate I had any trust in and got my write-in vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:16 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
No, it was a false alarm. Either they are incredibly elusive, or there is no such thing as an intelligent democrat.
Why should we believe you're qualified to judge intelligence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,823 posts, read 24,908,096 times
Reputation: 28520
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Why should we believe you're qualified to judge intelligence?
I could care less what you think of me. But please, next time, try fronting candidates with a functional brain, instead of dopes, sell outs and shills like Hitlery. Americans don't like to be played for fools time and time again by globalist establishment parasites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:30 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,035,501 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
If he's a P^ssy and made it to the White House for eight years, what does that make the candidates that you voted for that he stomped into a mudhole?
It makes them liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2016, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
4,958 posts, read 2,237,693 times
Reputation: 5839
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I agree but think he is too honorable for today's inept 2 party system that's likely a bigger threat to this country than most things that have people in fear. He was the only declared candidate I had any trust in and got my write-in vote.
I won't argue your point that he is too honorable for Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2016, 02:22 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
It makes them liberals.
Problem is, you voted for those liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2016, 02:29 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,841,834 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
They found a smart democrat. ????!.
all the intelligent democrats are either in hiding, or dead. hillary saw ro that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2016, 02:43 AM
 
Location: SW Florida
14,949 posts, read 12,147,503 times
Reputation: 24822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
I'm still going to respond.

Democrats potentially had the best candidate to run for office in decades.... Jim Webb. He's an honorable guy and I would likely have voted for him. However, Jim Webb was a little too honorable for today's Democratic Party. Thus, he didn't have a snowball's chance in hell.
IMO it would not have mattered who ran as a candidate on the Dem party platform, he/she would never have won the nomination because the DNC ordained that their Anointed One Hillary would ascend to the throne. But you are right on, IMO, about Jim Webb. Heck, if he had been running, I would have voted for him without hesitation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top