Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Apparently you don't know what "facts" are. That NYSlimes article is saying what has been said all along:
It "seems like", it "sounds like", none of that is actual fact.
Phishing is not hacking. Hacking, you get in whether someone gives you their information or not. Phishing, you just wait for someone stupid enough to give you their password...which Podesta did.
Your second "proof" link says this:
"Moderate confidence" is not proof. It's speculation...which is not fact.
Take a look at the people being targeted. This was absolutely Russian hacking. The evidence is there. Refusing to accept it because it doesn't fit your bias's is illogical.
And phishing is hacking. Jesus. Specifically this was a fairly sophisticated attack on a gmail account. While I could have done it better, not by much.
I know everyone has this idea of what hacking looks like. Its not. It looks EXACTLY like this, and gets more sophisticated once inside.
The bottom line is there is zero proof. None. Just like the recount showed the left cheated in detroit, and Trump wound up with more votes.
Or when more hillary electors defected more than Trumps.
This is fake news. There is no proof. Fake news like the muslim lady that got beat up on the subway by Trump supporters. Just nor true. Zero proof.
That's an interesting point:
All the drum pounding by the Left on election cheating, recounts, and more Trump electors bailing turned out to be cries of wolf when there was no wolf.
Take a look at the people being targeted. This was absolutely Russian hacking. The evidence is there. Refusing to accept it because it doesn't fit your bias's is illogical.
And phishing is hacking. Jesus. Specifically this was a fairly sophisticated attack on a gmail account. While I could have done it better, not by much.
I know everyone has this idea of what hacking looks like. Its not. It looks EXACTLY like this, and gets more sophisticated once inside.
Where's the proof? Just a tiny bit? Nothing. Zero.
I think the more important question is, what should be the punishment for the Russians?
A war?
Depends. Can we make them TRULY regret this via a similar method? If so...I have no issue with continuing the war like that. But our form of government is FAR more vulnerable to this. Go with our strengths. And currently thats our military.
Take a look at the people being targeted. This was absolutely Russian hacking. The evidence is there. Refusing to accept it because it doesn't fit your bias's is illogical.
And phishing is hacking. Jesus. Specifically this was a fairly sophisticated attack on a gmail account. While I could have done it better, not by much.
I know everyone has this idea of what hacking looks like. Its not. It looks EXACTLY like this, and gets more sophisticated once inside.
Phishing isn't hacking.
You must still be playing Oregon Trail on a HP 2100 minicomputer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
