Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
People that have immigrated here in the past were people that did so because they wanted to become part of America and it's culture. They weren't uprooted and moved 7000 miles by a U.S. government program because they were in a war zone. That never happened before in American history. Not in WWI and not in WWII by the hundreds of thousands.
Yeah, I'm not sure what is happening right now that makes the Syrians so special. My family was mostly of German and Polish decent. The English came to their farms, asking for help in WW1 and 2. The men agreed, and in payment of that life debt, the English sent the women and children to the USA to be safe, and the men stayed and died fighting beside England.
The death of that Little Boy and the other 500k dead people in Syria and Libya is all on Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton's war mongering in the Middle East.
What we should do is import refugees and ship them to Obama and Hillarys neighborhoods and let them live with their mess.
Obama single handily is the main cause of the Syrian civil war. He also has thousands of drone strikes on under this belt.
I don't want Refugees coming here , and we the american people shouldn't have to take Refugees from Wars that our president started.
Obama starts a war. Displaces millions of people. Then wants us to import Muslim refugees from his mistake.. no sorry Obama , you take them in your neighborhood and live with them.
I can't believe anyone seriously thinks this is a bad thing.
Can anyone put forth a coherent argument in favor of admitting hordes of refugees that aren't based on the dislike of Trump/conservatives or on kumbaya feelings?
It's un-Constitutional and goes against the foundation of our country, especially since in the past 10 years, not a single Syrian refugee has been charged with terrorism. Meanwhile, those who have committed terrorist acts came from countries that are not banned by Trump, because he has businesses ventures in them.
It's ok, the federal government is already being sued for false detainment at airports, so Trump is about to get smacked down by the courts.
Obama starts a war. Displaces millions of people. Then wants us to import Muslim refugees from his mistake.. no sorry Obama , you take them in your neighborhood and live with them.
...and the impetus behind this Syrian immigration policy was his attempt to salve his conscience over his foreign policy blunders and let ordinary Americans take the risk
Questions for those in support of this:
Suppose that Hillary had won and we had the Syrian immigrants coming over here to America.
Now let's imagine the odds of one or any of them conducting an act of terror that takes American lives.
Let's further imagine that you somehow could know that this attack would DIRECTLY impact you and your family.
Would you STILL take those odds?
Would you still be in support of Syrian immigration?
If not, why is OK to gamble with the lives of OTHER Americans?
See, two can play at this cheap-appeal-to-sentiment game.
I guess since it's an adult veteran rather than a child and doesn't have just the right photo angle and poetic backdrop as the image you posted, it doesn't tug at the heartstrings quite as much?
It's un-Constitutional and goes against the foundation of our country, especially since in the past 10 years, not a single Syrian refugee has been charged with terrorism. Meanwhile, those who have committed terrorist acts came from countries that are not banned by Trump, because he has businesses ventures in them.
It's ok, the federal government is already being sued for false detainment at airports, so Trump is about to get smacked down by the courts.
Its obvious. Half of Syria is under ISIS control. It wouldn't be hard to infiltrate the refugees as they said they would. They already have infiltrated Europe....
It's un-Constitutional and goes against the foundation of our country, especially since in the past 10 years, not a single Syrian refugee has been charged with terrorism. Meanwhile, those who have committed terrorist acts came from countries that are not banned by Trump, because he has businesses ventures in them.
It's ok, the federal government is already being sued for false detainment at airports, so Trump is about to get smacked down by the courts.
They aren't US citizens...under the Constitution, they are entitled to nothing from us.
See, two can play at this cheap-appeal-to-sentiment game.
I guess since it's an adult veteran rather than a child and doesn't have just the right photo angle, it doesn't tug at the heartstrings quite as much?
Typical Liberal non-sense. Always putting citizens of other countries FIRST before Americans. The democrat party still doesn't know why they lost...
Americans are sick of America putting FOREIGNERS first. Illegals First, Refugees First, Immigrants First....
Typical Democrat non-sense...
Why should some foreign person get to be brought here , put in a free home, and given assistance for free. When we have veterans who have lost limbs fighting for America , sitting on a corner homeless, hungry , and begging????
They aren't US citizens...under the Constitution, they are entitled to nothing from us.
I second this. Illegals, Refugees, and such forth HAVE 0 PROTECTION under the US Constitution.......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
