Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2017, 06:31 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
You dodged the question. Hey, I get that you may be frustrated with a situation BUT it's disingenuous/cowardly to cheer on mass violence ( I believe against "white people" if I heard it correctly) if you are not willing to put your own butt on the line to feel the consequences.
I have protested. I organized this one.

Protest slams store over K2 sales | News, Sports, Jobs - News and Sentinel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2017, 12:33 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,011,790 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Read the article and it shows you had a PEACEFUL protest which is just fine. So, may I ask you why you're voicing support for violent protests if (again) you personally are not right on the front lines?

The point I've been trying to make is that peaceful boisterous,vocal protests are part of our country's history but physically violent property damaging ones are not and should not be tolerated by ANY side.

It's easy to cheer violence on from your easy chair, if you're not the one facing jail, injury or worse and until one IS facing said consequences personally one might/should hold their tongues...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:33 PM
 
3,538 posts, read 1,327,650 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
Read the article and it shows you had a PEACEFUL protest which is just fine. So, may I ask you why you're voicing support for violent protests if (again) you personally are not right on the front lines?

The point I've been trying to make is that peaceful boisterous,vocal protests are part of our country's history but physically violent property damaging ones are not and should not be tolerated by ANY side.

It's easy to cheer violence on from your easy chair, if you're not the one facing jail, injury or worse and until one IS facing said consequences personally one might/should hold their tongues...
the Boston Tea Party is literally about destroying property.


another example was during the whiskey rebellion in the 1700's protestors tarred and feathered a messenger.


amongst other events.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:42 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
Read the article and it shows you had a PEACEFUL protest which is just fine. So, may I ask you why you're voicing support for violent protests if (again) you personally are not right on the front lines?
I answered that. Twice. I can also note that things remained peaceful because we got what we wanted. A new law passed.

Quote:
The point I've been trying to make is that peaceful boisterous,vocal protests are part of our country's history but physically violent property damaging ones are not and should not be tolerated by ANY side.
It is too. It's been noted over and over and over and over that the country is a country because of violent uprisings leading to war.

Why did the founders make sure to include the 2nd amendment?

Quote:
It's easy to cheer violence on from your easy chair, if you're not the one facing jail, injury or worse and until one IS facing said consequences personally one might/should hold their tongues...
You simply want to shut down things you disagree with. It's not going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8won6 View Post
the Boston Tea Party is literally about destroying property.


another example was during the whiskey rebellion in the 1700's protestors tarred and feathered a messenger.


amongst other events.

Your examples are irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,607,170 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I answered that. Twice. I can also note that things remained peaceful because we got what we wanted. A new law passed.



It is too. It's been noted over and over and over and over that the country is a country because of violent uprisings leading to war.

Why did the founders make sure to include the 2nd amendment?



You simply want to shut down things you disagree with. It's not going to happen.

So you're a pacifist when it comes to going to war with other countries, but you don't give a damn what happens to the property, livelihoods, and lives of Americans.

Got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:47 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
So you're a pacifist when it comes to going to war with other countries, but you don't give a damn what happens to the property, livelihoods, and lives of Americans.

Got it.
It gets old having to correct the same stupid stuff people post about me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 04:17 PM
 
3,538 posts, read 1,327,650 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Your examples are irrelevant.
My examples counter the exact argument presented by that person. Instead of just saying "nope" I provided examples. Troll fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Frisco, Texas
431 posts, read 257,417 times
Reputation: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Yep...as soon as you agree that the Republican Party is anti black.

Til then...nope.
Articulate to us again how the republican party is anti black?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 05:22 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,823,172 times
Reputation: 8442
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Your examples are irrelevant.
Those examples are very relevant considering they caused both property damage and personal damage...

Our country actually has a very deep history of riots that cause both property and physical damage so to think it is unusual and not historically accurate is very strange on the part of that poster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top