Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2017, 06:21 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,227,271 times
Reputation: 9845

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Hero? LOL....nope, but understanding what words mean, yes....obviously you don't.
You understand words??

That's news to me. But ok, if you say so. We're in alternative reality so I guess it's possible.



Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Wow....your are a special kind of person....huh....

O.K....

Spicer said that "gibbs and axelrod" attended those meetings "all the time.">>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes or no?

gibbs and axelrod said "I sat on the sidelines as a silent observer with Gibbs ">>>>>>>>>>>>Yes or no?

So, I understand it's hard for you to understand, but "all the time" does not mean "every time"....

And where did "they" lie?
Spicer said "All the time".

Axelrod said, "No true. Only a few times."

Where did you pull this "every time" from????? Who is saying "every time"???

No one but you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
I did use adult language, and you still failed...

Point is very clear...said it many times....

Where is the lie?

Don't care if you did report me....I did not do anything or say anything wrong....

It's been present....

Where is the lie?
I think you are trying to play on some schematics that because "all the time" doesn't equal to "every time", then "all the time" essentially is the same as "a few times".

Which is silly and indeed is a kindergarden-like thought process. If that is your logic, then you are more illogical than I thought. Anyone who tries to pull this silly word-game should hide in shame.

Every one and their mothers know "all the time" and "a few times" are two completely different meanings. Try telling your date you get drunk all the time!!- Vs you only gotten drunk a few times; and see the difference.

I sincerely hope you are not trying to argue this pathetic word game because that would mean you basically wasted my time and yours on an a silly point that a kindergarener could have told you how stupid it is.

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2017, 07:45 PM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You understand words??

That's news to me. But ok, if you say so. We're in alternative reality so I guess it's possible.





Spicer said "All the time".

Axelrod said, "No true. Only a few times."

Where did you pull this "every time" from????? Who is saying "every time"???

No one but you.




I think you are trying to play on some schematics that because "all the time" doesn't equal to "every time", then "all the time" essentially is the same as "a few times".

Which is silly and indeed is a kindergarden-like thought process. If that is your logic, then you are more illogical than I thought. Anyone who tries to pull this silly word-game should hide in shame.

Every one and their mothers know "all the time" and "a few times" are two completely different meanings. Try telling your date you get drunk all the time!!- Vs you only gotten drunk a few times; and see the difference.

I sincerely hope you are not trying to argue this pathetic word game because that would mean you basically wasted my time and yours on an a silly point that a kindergarener could have told you how stupid it is.

.
O.K., lets end this, your OP said they lied....Where is the lie? You want to play words, where in your OP did they lie?

Your own link proves you 100% completely wrong....

You like to play words, so lets go....you are playing a stupid leftist game....


Where is the lie? You said it, now prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 07:54 PM
 
426 posts, read 423,717 times
Reputation: 312
At this rate, I'll be more shocked if Trump and his gang told the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 11:25 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,227,271 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
O.K., lets end this, your OP said they lied....Where is the lie? You want to play words, where in your OP did they lie?

Your own link proves you 100% completely wrong....

You like to play words, so lets go....you are playing a stupid leftist game....


Where is the lie? You said it, now prove it.

Oh great. we're basically back to square one.

"Where's the lie" is linked to on the very first post of this thread. If you still don't get it then God helps you because no mortal can.

Have fun with it. Thanks for wasting my time.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2017, 11:35 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
It is a sad day for CNN, when they have been proved over and over they are fake news and they cannot prove INFOWARS has published Fake News.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2017, 06:39 AM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
Oh great. we're basically back to square one.

"Where's the lie" is linked to on the very first post of this thread. If you still don't get it then God helps you because no mortal can.

Have fun with it. Thanks for wasting my time.
.
Your own damn link proves you wrong.......

Talk about wasting time.....

Here for one last damn time....here is your OP.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
They just can't help themselves, can they? They lied knowing full well they will be called on it by the very person they lied about.


David Axelrod: I woke up this morning as an alternative fact - CNN.com

Then in your own link, in axlerods own words, he said they did attend them.....

Your reading comprehension....well, it appears you just don't have any....

Quote:
I sat on the sidelines as a silent observer with Gibbs because we would be called upon to publicly discuss the president's decision on that critical matter and the process by which he arrived at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2017, 06:51 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,368,692 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
As is all the time, is not every time.
Correct.


As a principal on the Council, how often will Bannon attend the meetings - significantly more or about the same as Axelrod?


As a principal on the Council, will Bannon just sit/listen/observe like Axelrod did, or will he openly contribute?


To compare Bannon's presence to Axelrod's is beyond intellectually dishonest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2017, 06:56 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,368,692 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Your own damn link proves you wrong.......

Talk about wasting time.....

Here for one last damn time....here is your OP.....




Then in your own link, in axlerods own words, he said they did attend them.....

Your reading comprehension....well, it appears you just don't have any....


"All the time" is in no way equivalent to "a few times", no matter how hard you try to parse words or split hairs.


Spicer, intentionally or not, lied about Axelrod's attendance in an attempt to justify Bannon. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:02 AM
 
3,356 posts, read 1,232,088 times
Reputation: 2301
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
More fake news from CNN, big surprise.


Spicer didn't lie, David Axelrod did in fact attend National Security Council meetings.

If CNN is going to try to spread fake news, don't have David Axelrod on your network admitting that he attended National Security Council meetings.
How do YOU know which meetings he attended and what was said?
Looks like when attended he was sidelined and an observer.
He didn't attend sensitive meetings.
Were you in fact there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2017, 08:03 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,308,171 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
More fake news from CNN, big surprise.


Spicer didn't lie, David Axelrod did in fact attend National Security Council meetings.

If CNN is going to try to spread fake news, don't have David Axelrod on your network admitting that he attended National Security Council meetings.

There's a huge difference between having a seat at the table and taking part in the decisions and sitting in the back as an observer. Are you being deliberately abstruse?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top