Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2017, 11:27 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,356,098 times
Reputation: 22904

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash View Post
Nonsense. The ACA deals with other issues like pre existing conditions, keeping college kids on parents ins, and other technical items for people who can afford ins on their own or get it through work .
^ This. Thank you.

 
Old 02-02-2017, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,587,616 times
Reputation: 9169
The ONLY way that cost can be contained in private healthcare is for patients to be required to pay up front, and those who don't have the money be turned away and refused treatment, treating healthcare like a DVD or a Pizza rather than what it actually is.

I don't know too many people who are ok with that....
 
Old 02-02-2017, 12:24 PM
 
45,542 posts, read 27,152,040 times
Reputation: 23856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
The most efficient replacement is Medicare For All. No new government agency is required, it's an expansion of an existing program. Unfortunately Trump has ruled out single payer as a replacement.
... which is the correct take.
 
Old 02-02-2017, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
... which is the correct take.
Currently Medicare is woefully underfunded as is. Also most Americans pay less than 50% of their healthcare premiums due to their employer or spouse's employer footing most of the bill. Do you wish to explode the already 100 trillion dollar unfunded liability or further burden the working middle class?
 
Old 02-02-2017, 12:42 PM
 
4,851 posts, read 2,282,175 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Currently Medicare is woefully underfunded as is. Also most Americans pay less than 50% of their healthcare premiums due to their employer or spouse's employer footing most of the bill. Do you wish to explode the already 100 trillion dollar unfunded liability or further burden the working middle class?


Single payer can work if done right . Somehow most every other non 3rd world country in the world manages it, but it is somehow beyond the self proclaimed greatest country on Earth to do what these others can .


Removing profit and greed from the system is the first step , but one which can never happen in a system based on making a profit , even at the expense of patient health if needed.
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
The ONLY way that cost can be contained in private healthcare is for patients to be required to pay up front, and those who don't have the money be turned away and refused treatment, treating healthcare like a DVD or a Pizza rather than what it actually is.

I don't know too many people who are ok with that....
Please quit talking about costs and business until you know what you are talking about. We know for a fact that competition lowers costs and increases quality.
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,851,639 times
Reputation: 10371
“All the elements of Rand’s plan are moving us in the right direction toward patient-centered health-care, lower costs, bigger pools to insure everyone and cover preexisting conditions and I think that many members will look favorably on it,” Brat told TheDCNF. “From what I’ve seen so far this is the most free-market approach to health care that will truly bend down the cost curve.”

South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford said he’s considering introducing a companion bill in the House, noting he still needs to have discussions with HFC members about co-sponsoring the legislation.

EXCLUSIVE: Rand Paul's Obamacare Replacement Gains Traction With House Conservatives | The Daily Caller
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I was ahead of the curve on this. The GOP after all the talk of repeal, repeal, are softening up and realizing what a monstrosity and disaster it would be to remove all of Obamacare altogether.
Well, then, good call.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
And replace it with what?
How about replacing it with nothing?

Why not entice the States to set up their own plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metsfan53 View Post
and there you have it- the actual plan in a nutshell...hope you don't know anybody with a prior condition or someone who exhausted their lifetime limits...I guess the cancer was their fault, right?
How much money should be spent on one individual?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
The most efficient replacement is Medicare For All. No new government agency is required, it's an expansion of an existing program.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
... which is the correct take.
Medicare for all would require increasing the HI payroll tax from 1.45% for employer and employee to 12+% for employer and employee.

I thought Liberals were opposed to regressive taxes like payroll taxes?
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,587,616 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Please quit talking about costs and business until you know what you are talking about. We know for a fact that competition lowers costs and increases quality.
I do know what I'm talking about. Currently, doctors have to treat everyone in this country regardless of ability to pay, which means demand exceeds supply, which means rather than just accepting less money, the providers soak the people who can pay to make up the difference.

If those who couldn't pay were just denied treatment, that would lower demand which would lower the cost.

And in a field like medicine, which is labor intensive, the cost could only go down so much, before it would affect the salaries of doctors and nurses, which would then cause more people who would've gone into medicine to go into different fields instead, so then you get into a supply problem again and the cost goes right back up. No one will want to be a doctor if it would only pay $40-50k/yr.
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:52 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,957 posts, read 8,486,926 times
Reputation: 6777
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
I do know what I'm talking about. Currently, doctors have to treat everyone in this country regardless of ability to pay, which means demand exceeds supply, which means rather than just accepting less money, the providers soak the people who can pay to make up the difference.

If those who couldn't pay were just denied treatment, that would lower demand which would lower the cost.

And in a field like medicine, which is labor intensive, the cost could only go down so much, before it would affect the salaries of doctors and nurses, which would then cause more people who would've gone into medicine to go into different fields instead, so then you get into a supply problem again and the cost goes right back up. No one will want to be a doctor if it would only pay $40-50k/yr.
But would you be a Doctor for $100K to $150K? We've had people complaining about fast food workers wanting 15 bucks an hour, but then never complain about Doctors who make millions. How about letting nurses and physician assistants write prescriptions? That'll eliminate a lot of doctor visits!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top