How's that "Muslim banny" stuff working out for ya?

[natalie469]

Originally Posted by Horizonite

^^The liberal alternate universe on full display

Oh no, alternate facts was created by kellieann. And now you are just repeating it lol Too funny

[Informed Info]

Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey

What promise has he fulfilled?


The Muslim ban got ruled out. The construction of the fence has yet taken place.

It has been 3 weeks and is already proven to be a failed administration.

Yeah...an entire 3 weeks.

What did Obama accomplish in his first 3 weeks?

12 rounds of golf?

Originally Posted by natalie469

LOL even Rudy said it was a muslim ban. But ok, so any other religion from those countries would be allowed entry into our country or not. This is what is confusing. So maybe you can explain it to me.

Why is this confusing?

Muslims are the ones who have a jihad going on.

Muslims are the ones who flew planes in to the twin towers.

Muslims are the Boston "refugee" bombers.

Muslims were behind the "drive a truck" in to a crowd on Bastille Day.

Muslims strap suicide vests on kids.

Muslims were behind Bataclan....

Do you NOT see the trend?

Why not deal with REALITY and call a spade a spade? It's not the Greek Orthodox who have terrorized/are terrorizing the world.

[natalie469]

Originally Posted by Informed Info

Yeah...an entire 3 weeks.

What did Obama accomplish in his first 3 weeks?

12 rounds of golf?



Why is this confusing?

Muslims are the ones who have a jihad going on.

Muslims are the ones who flew planes in to the twin towers.

Muslims are the Boston "refugee" bombers.

Muslims were behind the "drive a truck" in to a crowd on Bastille Day.

Muslims strap suicide vests on kids.

Muslims were behind Bataclan....

Do you NOT see the trend?

Why not deal with REALITY and call a spade a spade? It's not the Greek Orthodox who have terrorized/are terrorizing the world.

The poster I was replying to said it wasn't a muslim ban and I argued that point. Thanks for backing me up

[Informed Info]

Originally Posted by natalie469

The poster I was replying to said it wasn't a muslim ban and I argued that point. Thanks for backing me up

You didn't argue & I didn't back you up.

You were confused.

This is YOU:

LOL even Rudy said it was a muslim ban. But ok, so any other religion from those countries would be allowed entry into our country or not. This is what is confusing. So maybe you can explain it to me.

Did Trump's EO allow Christian or Jewish refugees in? Was is based on religion or countries?

Perhaps I misinterpreted your uninformed and true "confusion" for liberal rhetoric. I apologize for seeing snark, on your part, when it was only lack of education.

So let me help you:

It's not a ban on a specific religion, while it should be, it's a ban on certain countries due to the fact that those countries are unstable & are inundated with radical believers of the worst that the Muslim/Islam religion has to offer.

Obama, Clinton, Carter... did the same while they were in office.

Hope this helps!

/eyeroll

[Mightyqueen801]

Originally Posted by North Beach Person

Just reading it I know I couldn't follow it even if I'd seen it.

That was the point of the sketch! The reporter looks completely baffled.

It was very well done. Exaggerated, of course.

[sandsthetime]

Originally Posted by BOS2IAD

Nope^^^^

Deportations come mostly from border, DHS chief says - Washington Times

High deportation figures are misleading - LA Times

Not surprised you provide links from two biased conservative publications.

[Rambler123]

Originally Posted by shiftymh

Making people whine about him 24/7 is good enough for now.

It is a telling sign just how often some variant of this defense is used to justify Trump's actions.

"Well, liberals hate him, so he must be doing the right thing."

"Uh, he's hurting liberals, so I like him."

"I don't care what he's doing, so long as he's making liberals heads explode."

There's so much wrong with this mindset it's not funny.

First of all, "hurting others" is not a valid strategy of governance. Seriously, check your history - that type of crap never works in the long run and literally cannot get a nation's act together and accomplish anything.

Second, the right's sweeping characterization of "liberals" has really gotten out of hand. Aside from the usual nonsense of how "liberals want to destroy America" we've now reached the point where anyone who disagrees with Trump (even after backing that up with facts) is just dismissed as a "liberal." Again, study history. We shouldn't be mindlessly goose-stepping along with Trump, obeying his every whim - that is grossly un-American. And we should be putting facts ahead of "alternate facts," and the facts say that Trump is a terrible choice for president and is doing a lousy job.

Finally, I find the irony of malice as a reason to vote for somebody vs. the right-wingers endless whining about being portrayed as hate-filled thugs that lack empathy rather humorous. If the best you can do to defend the Sleazebag in Chief is brag about how much "he's hurting people you don't like," than you know what? Maybe those hate-filled stereotypes of right-wing extremists are accurate.

[T-310]

Meh, new EO forthcoming that will get around the ninth circus.