Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Huffington post violated its own policy. It says it freely allows its contributors to do such, but then when the article wasn't the lying garbage that progressives peddle, they axed it because HP is a fascist propaganda arm of the progressive party who lies.
It's no different than this very forum. We can post whatever we want, but if a post/thread is found to violate the Terms of Service, it can be taken down.
She's a trusted contributor. It means she's allowed to freely post articles she has written as long as they do not violate the Terms of Standards. It's almost no different than these forums. We are allowed to freely post without a pre-verification, but if a post or thread violates the ToS, it can be deleted and an infraction/ban instantiated.
What we post, however, is not a reflection on City-Data, though.
It's no different than this very forum. We can post whatever we want, but if a post/thread is found to violate the Terms of Service, it can be taken down.
The article published is there for anyone to see. It's lined in the OP to webarchive.
By what you said, Huffington Post's TOS must secretly say there are to be no Pro-Trump (or even truthful) articles written about Trump.
It's no different than this very forum. We can post whatever we want, but if a post/thread is found to violate the Terms of Service, it can be taken down.
Not arguing that, sure... they can cut whatever they like, BUT... they can't lay claim to being honest news. By doing such, they identify themselves as a progressive propaganda rag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator
She's a trusted contributor. It means she's allowed to freely post articles she has written as long as they do not violate the Terms of Standards. It's almost no different than these forums. We are allowed to freely post without a pre-verification, but if a post or thread violates the ToS, it can be deleted and an infraction/ban instantiated.
What we post, however, is not a reflection on City-Data, though.
What TOS did she violate? Going against the progressive narrative? Note toeing the line of the talking points?
Lets call a spade a spade here. We know why they did it. IT is no surprise that HP is a hardcore progressive rag that consistently pushes a progressive narrative. So, it is not a surprise they deleted an article that put their most hated enemy in a light that was not according to the narrative.
According to the Huffington Post editors, you are not supposed to know.
No, nothing happened in the context that Trump was attempting to relate an event on the scale of the others he had mentioned.
No, the only thing that happened of Friday night was Trump saw one report on television and jumped to some sort of erroneous conclusion in his misstatement.
Do you mean the accusation that Trump said there was a "terrorist" even on that day?
So what happened that night?
When you cite a list of terrorists attacks and include a statement about what happened in Sweden the night before, a reasonable person would draw the conclusion that something happened.
I'm not sure why the Trump explainers don't understand that? It is pure logic.
The accusation made against Trump saying there was terrorism was false. He didn't say it. But google translate can be used on Swedish media if you are so inclined to discover the events on a certain date.
You look at what's happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this? Sweden.
"Last night" in context would be Feb 17th. So - what happened?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.