Progressives call it "Neoliberalism" and conservatives call it "globalism, " but the latter is kooky (Israel, illegal aliens)

[knowledgeiskey]

The two terms are used evoke alarmism.


Here's what differentiates the two though.


Progressives see cross border trade and deregulation as a threat to poor people and and the environment. The drawback of social programs contribute to inequality. All of which is backed by empiricism.


"Globalism" on the other hand is a conspiracy theory that holds Jews in control of all institutions. Mass immigration is seen as a Jewish conspiracy to undermine national sovereignty. None of which is backed by evidence.

[BentBow]

Globalism = A centralized World government ruling all nations as States under their umbrella. Just as the Federal Government rules over our States now(it use to be the other way around)
Thus the reason for the EU, as a version of our united states(they have nothing close to our Constitution) Small States have no say.

[theunbrainwashed]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Globalism = A centralized World government ruling all nations as States under their umbrella. Just as the Federal Government rules over our States now(it use to be the other way around)
Thus the reason for the EU, as a version of our united states(they have nothing close to our Constitution) Small States have no say.

For less than 20 years, you forgot to add. Articles of Confederation were a complete failure, and a confederation is what we see the EU as, and it's barely holding together these days; very similar problems experienced between 1779-1787. And, states' rights were only ever used to justify slavery

[stburr91]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Globalism = A centralized World government ruling all nations as States under their umbrella. Just as the Federal Government rules over our States now(it use to be the other way around)
Thus the reason for the EU, as a version of our united states(they have nothing close to our Constitution) Small States have no say.

Correct.

Globalism has nothing to do with some Jewish conspircy, the OP is completely out to lunch.

[knowledgeiskey]

Originally Posted by stburr91

Correct.

Globalism has nothing to do with some Jewish conspircy, the OP is completely out to lunch.

You know it is. Lol

[Yankeeinblack]

Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey

You know it is. Lol

How about we debate whether the Jews are behind the NWO/ Globalism at a later date? UN Agenda 2030, do the research......

Fact of the matter: Having the elite 1% ruling over decisions that affect every country and person on the planet.......let me say that again "EVERY.COUNTRY.EVERY.PERSON...ON EARTH is in no ones best interests

The Neoliberals are having a meltdown over who can go into which potty/head/water closet/ latrine......and shower ( now there's the room they should be concerned about) just wait until the ancient/wealthy Oligarchs take control of each.and.every.thought.decision.and action undertaken in their lives. Total control.Total.Absolute.... and the abuse ain't far behind

Think about that one...Liberal Utopias "cost too much"....Think of life more along the lines of the " Robber Barons and the Gilded Age" of the United States. Look that one up, and read about it....and see what you have in store for your future. Whether you are a tinker, tailor, solider or spy. Or into today's terms, lawyer, doctor, banker, STEM.

Next Bank crash? They can seize your complete bank account(s) and other financial funds ....look it up... British PM Cameron suggested/threaten to do this awhile back. Or raise taxes..."take your choice". Geez, thanks PM The law is already in place to do so "if they wish".

negative interest rates are already in place on the planet...many investment accounts are paying no interest on your investment in their product, but are charging high service charges on those accounts to hold your money.I had one account paying less than 0.5% interest, but charging 75.00 a month to maintain the account. Believe me, It was a small account, but held enough monies to avoid any carrying costs in the recent past, needless to say, I closed that one out. It was a fiscal product considered to be a retirement account, but whose retirement was it "funding"?

Too much credit card debit? Well, debts can be dealt with thru debtors prisons....already laws on the books for that, too. Probably would not enact that law unless said people "questioned and pursued acts of rebellion" against total and complete control.

As Lee Iacocca once stated ( previous CEO of Chrysler Corporation, if you are too young to remember...) Give anyone enough power, and they will become sociopathic. Give a small group of monied elites all the power, and you can consider your each and every action to be monitored,controlled and dictated.

Just think of who and what are the elite 1% currently, follow the money and see/ study their agendas.

And see if their agenda jives with how you envision your life in the future...probably not what you were hoping for.

[PedroMartinez]

Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey

The two terms are used evoke alarmism.


Here's what differentiates the two though.


Progressives see cross border trade and deregulation as a threat to poor people and and the environment. The drawback of social programs contribute to inequality. All of which is backed by empiricism.


"Globalism" on the other hand is a conspiracy theory that holds Jews in control of all institutions. Mass immigration is seen as a Jewish conspiracy to undermine national sovereignty. None of which is backed by evidence.

Kooky? This coming from the person already theorizing Trump won't give up his office if he loses in the next election.

That's rich.

[Yankeeinblack]

Originally Posted by thomasb

Take a look at Twitter sometime with these trending hashtags on refugees or immigration. See the names of the people who are posting in support of illegal aliens, refugees, transgender, etc.

There is a huge disproportional amount of ultra-leftist Jews who push these policies. Even look at articles on the internet and many of them have a disproportional amount of Jewish names behind them.

Additionally - some of the biggest pushes and donors of globalization are Jewish and Jewish hedge-ran funds.

In both Europe and America, large scale third world immigration has very often been pushed by Jews. Look at the 1965 immigration act - which group do you think lobbied heavily for that despite being a small portion of the population?

Mass immigration to White countries may not be a "jewish conspiracy" but certainly a disproportional amount of Jewish people go out of their way to scream for it (all while rejecting diversity in Israel).

Diversity for the Europeans and the United States but a Jewish Nation State for Israel...kinda a dichotomy, no?

[knowledgeiskey]

Originally Posted by thomasb

Take a look at Twitter sometime with these trending hashtags on refugees or immigration. See the names of the people who are posting in support of illegal aliens, refugees, transgender, etc.

There is a huge disproportional amount of ultra-leftist Jews who push these policies. Even look at articles on the internet and many of them have a disproportional amount of Jewish names behind them.

Additionally - some of the biggest pushes and donors of globalization are Jewish and Jewish hedge-ran funds.

In both Europe and America, large scale third world immigration has very often been pushed by Jews. Look at the 1965 immigration act - which group do you think lobbied heavily for that despite being a small portion of the population?

Mass immigration to White countries may not be a "jewish conspiracy" but certainly a disproportional amount of Jewish people go out of their way to scream for it (all while rejecting diversity in Israel).

And this post proves my point.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Globalism = A centralized World government ruling all nations as States under their umbrella. Just as the Federal Government rules over our States now(it use to be the other way around)
Thus the reason for the EU, as a version of our united states(they have nothing close to our Constitution) Small States have no say.

Under the Articles of Confederation, which failed. The Constitution was always meant to be a Federal government with the central government being the most powerful. That was the very point of writing the Constitution.